U-Haul Holding Company's (NYSE:UHAL) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies With 43% Ownership, Institutions Own 37%
U-Haul Holding Company's (NYSE:UHAL) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies With 43% Ownership, Institutions Own 37%
Key Insights
主要見解
- U-Haul Holding's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 52% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in U-Haul Holding is 37%
- u-haul控股的重要私人公司所有權表明,重要決策受到更多公衆股東的影響
- 前三大股東持有該業務的52%。
- u-haul控股的機構所有權爲37%
A look at the shareholders of U-Haul Holding Company (NYSE:UHAL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一看u-haul控股公司(紐交所:UHAL)的股東,我們可以了解哪一群體最具影響力。我們可以看到私人公司擁有該公司43%的所有權。換句話說,如果股票上漲,他們將從中獲益最多(或者在市場下行時損失最大)。
And institutions on the other hand have a 37% ownership in the company. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones.
另一方面,機構在該公司中擁有37%的所有權。 機構經常持有較大公司的股票,而我們預計會看到內部人士持有較小公司顯著百分比。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of U-Haul Holding, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究U-Haul控股的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About U-Haul Holding?
機構持股告訴我們有關U-Haul控股的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in U-Haul Holding. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at U-Haul Holding's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在U-Haul控股中有相當大的股份。 這表明在專業投資者中享有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下降。 因此值得查看U-Haul控股下面的收益歷史。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in U-Haul Holding. Foster Road LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 43% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.2% and 3.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
對u-haul Holding的平頭基金持有的股份不多。Foster Road LLC目前是公司最大的股東,持有43%的流通股份。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的5.2%和3.4%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前3大股東共控制了公司股份的一半以上,這意味着他們有相當大的權力來影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of U-Haul Holding
u-haul Holding的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in U-Haul Holding Company. Insiders own US$165m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東可能會對股東了解到董事會持有u-haul控股公司股份感興趣。 內部持有價值16500萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 大多數人會說,這顯示了股東和董事會之間利益的良好一致性。 儘管如此,檢查那些內部人員是否一直在賣出或許是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over U-Haul Holding. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有18%股權的普通公衆,主要是個人投資者,對u-haul控股公司有一定程度的影響力。 儘管這個群體可能不能決定一切,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實質影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 43%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的43%。這可能值得更深入地挖掘。如果相關方,如內部人員,對其中一個私人公司感興趣,那麼應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對該公司具有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand U-Haul Holding better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for U-Haul Holding (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.
考慮到持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。 但要更好地了解u-haul控股公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 就像風險一樣。 每家公司都有風險,而我們已經發現了u-haul控股公司的3個警示信號(其中1個是重要的!),您應該了解。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。