ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE:SFBS) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 71%
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE:SFBS) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 71%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, ServisFirst Bancshares' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 鑑於機構在該股票中的重大股權,ServisFirst Bancshares的股價可能會受到其交易決策的影響
- 企業前11大股東持有其51%的股份。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
Every investor in ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE:SFBS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE:SFBS)的投資者都應該意識到最有影響力的股東群體。機構持有該公司的最大份額,佔比達71%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(如果出現市場下行,則將損失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ServisFirst Bancshares, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解servisfirst bancshares每種所有者的類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ServisFirst Bancshares?
機構持股告訴我們關於servisfirst bancshares的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
ServisFirst Bancshares already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ServisFirst Bancshares' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
ServisFirst Bancshares已經有機構股東在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這支股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看ServisFirst Bancshares的下面收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的事情。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. ServisFirst Bancshares is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 10% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Thomas Broughton directly holds 2.4% of the total shares outstanding.
由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股票的一半,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。servisfirst bancshares不是對沖基金的所有者。黑石集團目前是最大的股東,持有14%的流通股。第二大股東持有約10%的流通股,而第三大股東擁有5.3%的持股。此外,公司CEO Thomas Broughton直接持有總流通股的2.4%。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更詳細地看一下我們的所有權數據顯示,前11名股東擁有組合所有權的51%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of ServisFirst Bancshares
ServisFirst Bancshares的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$373m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告說,ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.的內部人員擁有股份。 內部人員持有的股份價值爲37300萬美元。 大多數人會認爲這是一個非常積極的跡象。 大多數人會認爲這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。 儘管如此,值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有公司的20%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這個群體不能必然佔據主導地位,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ServisFirst Bancshares better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for ServisFirst Bancshares you should be aware of.
考慮不同擁有公司股份的群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解servisfirst bancshares,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉個例子:我們發現了servisfirst bancshares的一個警告標誌,您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。