SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
SunCoke Energy (NYSE:SXC) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies SunCoke Energy, Inc. (NYSE:SXC) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性與風險並非同義詞。」 當您評估一家公司的風險時,自然會考慮其資產負債表,因爲債務往往在企業倒閉時涉及。和許多其他公司一樣,SunCoke Energy, Inc. (紐交所:SXC) 使用債務。但股東們是否應該擔心它使用債務呢?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
當企業不能輕鬆地通過自由現金流或以有利的價格籌集資金來滿足債務和其他負債時,債務和其他負債將成爲企業的風險。資本主義的本質是「創造性毀滅」的過程,在這個過程中,倒閉的企業被無情地清算。然而,更普遍的(但仍然痛苦的)情況是,它必須以低價籌集新的股本資本,因此永久性地稀釋股東的權益。當然,債務可以是企業中的一個重要工具,尤其是在資本密集型企業中。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先看現金和債務的結合。
What Is SunCoke Energy's Debt?
什麼是suncoke energy的債務?
As you can see below, SunCoke Energy had US$491.8m of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it does have US$164.7m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$327.1m.
正如下面所示,SunCoke Energy在2024年9月擁有49180萬美元的債務,與前一年相當。您可以點擊圖表查看更詳細的信息。然而,它確實有16470萬美元的現金來抵消這筆債務,導致淨債務約爲32710萬美元。
A Look At SunCoke Energy's Liabilities
查看suncoke energy的負債情況
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that SunCoke Energy had liabilities of US$205.2m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$758.6m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$164.7m and US$85.8m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$713.3m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,SunCoke Energy 在一年內到期的負債爲20520萬美元,而到期日之後的負債爲75860萬美元。另一方面,它持有16470萬美元現金和一年內到期的應收賬款價值 8580萬美元。因此,它的總負債爲71330萬美元,比其現金和短期應收賬款總額多。
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$867.0m. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
相對於其市值爲86700萬美元,這是一座巨大的槓桿山。這表明,如果公司需要緊急補充資產負債表,股東將面臨嚴重攤薄。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
爲了比較一個公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們考慮了債務的絕對數量以及支付的利率。
Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 1.2 and interest cover of 6.0 times, it seems to us that SunCoke Energy is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. So we'd recommend keeping a close eye on the impact financing costs are having on the business. One way SunCoke Energy could vanquish its debt would be if it stops borrowing more but continues to grow EBIT at around 17%, as it did over the last year. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if SunCoke Energy can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
看到其淨債務與EBITDA之比爲1.2倍,利息保障倍數爲6.0倍,我們認爲SunCoke Energy 可能是相當理性地使用債務。因此,我們建議密切關注融資成本對業務產生的影響。一個解決SunCoke Energy 債務問題的方法是停止借貸,但繼續以約17% 的速度增長EBIt,就像過去一年那樣。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終,業務未來的盈利能力將決定SunCoke Energy 是否能夠隨着時間加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份免費報告顯示分析師的盈利預測。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, SunCoke Energy recorded free cash flow worth 80% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
但我們的最後考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司不能用紙面利潤支付債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,我們明顯需要關注EBIt是否帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去最近的三年中,SunCoke Energy 記錄了價值 80% EBIt 的自由現金流,這在正常範圍內,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅款。這筆冷硬現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Happily, SunCoke Energy's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its level of total liabilities. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that SunCoke Energy can handle its debt fairly comfortably. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for SunCoke Energy you should be aware of, and 1 of them doesn't sit too well with us.
高興的是,SunCoke Energy出色地將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流,這意味着它在債務方面佔據上風。 但更令人擔憂的是,我們對其總負債水平有些擔憂。 綜合考慮所有上述因素,我們認爲SunCoke Energy能夠相當舒適地處理其債務。 當然,雖然這種槓桿可以增強股本回報,但也帶來更多風險,因此值得關注這一點。 當您分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要重點關注的領域。 但歸根結底,每家公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。 一個例子是:我們發現了SunCoke Energy的 3個警示信號,您應該注意其中之一,其中有一個讓我們感到不太滿意。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。