T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:TROW) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 74% of the Company
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:TROW) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 74% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in T. Rowe Price Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 24 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構對普信集團的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響
- 前24名股東擁有公司的51%
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
To get a sense of who is truly in control of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:TROW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着納斯達克普信集團股份有限公司(NASDAQ:TROW),重要的是了解業務的所有權結構。 機構擁有74%的股份,是公司中持股最多的。 換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of T. Rowe Price Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究普信集團每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About T. Rowe Price Group?
機構持股告訴我們普信集團的什麼情況?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that T. Rowe Price Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of T. Rowe Price Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到普信集團確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。 但是,最好對依賴於機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。 他們也有時會犯錯誤。 如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,股價大幅下跌並非罕見。 因此,值得查看普信集團過去的收入變化軌跡(如下所示)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. T. Rowe Price Group is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.7% by the third-largest shareholder.
由於機構投資者擁有超過半數發行股票,董事會可能必須關注他們的偏好。普信集團不是由對沖基金擁有。 目前,先鋒集團擁有該公司最多股份的12%。例如,第二大股東持有約8.8%的股份,第三大股東持有6.7%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 24 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步調查,我們發現前24名股東在公司中擁有總共51%的股權,這表明沒有單一股東對公司具有重大控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of T. Rowe Price Group
普信集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. Insiders own US$542m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以看到,內部持有t. Rowe Price Group, Inc.的股份。 內部持有價值5,4200萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到這種投資水平是很好的。您可以在這裏檢查內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 24% stake in T. Rowe Price Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在普信集團持有24%的股份。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但確實對公司的運行產生實質影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。