Institutional Owners May Ignore Freeport-McMoRan Inc.'s (NYSE:FCX) Recent US$2.8b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore Freeport-McMoRan Inc.'s (NYSE:FCX) Recent US$2.8b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Freeport-McMoRan's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構持有量顯著高,意味着麥克莫蘭銅金的股價對其交易行爲敏感。
- 共有17名投資者擁有該公司50%的股權
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
Every investor in Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (NYSE:FCX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 85% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位麥克莫蘭銅金股票投資者都應該注意最大股東群體。 擁有85%股份,機構在公司中擁有最大股份。 換句話說,如果股價上漲(或者如果市場出現下滑),這個群體將獲益最多(或者損失最多)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.1% last week. However, the 38% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
在投資中虧錢是沒有股東喜歡的事情,尤其是看到上週他們持有的股票價值下跌了4.1% 的機構投資者。然而,股東們一年38%的回報可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。然而,我們認爲他們可能會警惕未來的風險。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Freeport-McMoRan, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究麥克莫蘭銅金每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Freeport-McMoRan?
機構投資者的持股情況對我們關於麥克莫蘭銅金的理解有所啓示。正如您所看到的,機構投資者在麥克莫蘭銅金中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明,該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好還是謹慎地依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂的驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看下面的Freeport-McMoRan的收益歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Freeport-McMoRan. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Freeport-McMoRan's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所見,機構投資者在麥克莫蘭銅金中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着那些爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會有風險,他們處於一個'擁擠的交易'中。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個交易方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以看到麥克莫蘭銅金的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加複雜。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Freeport-McMoRan. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.5% of shares outstanding. Capital Research and Management Company is the second largest shareholder owning 7.7% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.5% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半已發行股份,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。我們注意到對麥克莫蘭銅金沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。目前,先鋒集團擁有公司最大股份的8.5%。資本研究和管理公司是第二大股東,持有7.7%的普通股,而黑石集團持有約7.5%的公司股票。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前17名股東在該公司擁有50%的持股,這意味着沒有單一股東對公司擁有顯著的控制力。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Freeport-McMoRan
Freeport-McMoRan的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$321m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,內部持有人名下擁有麥克莫蘭銅金公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,所以如果看到內部持有人擁有大比例的公司股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值32100萬美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。可以說最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
總體來說,公衆股東,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能完全掌控公司,但肯定對公司經營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Freeport-McMoRan better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終值得考慮公司股東的不同群體。但要更好地了解麥克莫蘭銅金,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。