With 87% Ownership in Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ:LRCX), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 87% Ownership in Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ:LRCX), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lam Research's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 22 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構持有的 Lam Research 股票較高,這意味着股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 這家公司的前22大股東擁有其50%的股份。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
If you want to know who really controls Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ:LRCX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 87% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着 Lam Research 公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LRCX),那麼您需要看看其股東登記冊的組成。 擁有公司最多股份的集團,準確地說約佔公司股份的 87%,是機構。 也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個集團將獲益最多(或在市場下行時損失最多)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$4.2b in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 27% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上週該公司市值增加了42億美元,機構投資者的前景看好。股東的一年回報率目前爲27%,而上週的增長更是錦上添花。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lam Research.
讓我們仔細看看,不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Lam Research的什麼事情。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lam Research?
機構所有權告訴我們關於Lam Research的什麼事情?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lam Research. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lam Research's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Lam Research中持有相當數量的股份。這表明在專業投資者中存在一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看以下Lam Research的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Lam Research is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. With 9.3% and 4.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
由於機構投資者擁有超過公開發行股票的一半,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。拉姆研究並不是由對沖基金持有。BlackRock,Inc.目前擁有該公司10%的流通股。分別擁有9.3%和4.5%的流通股,The Vanguard Group,Inc.和道富銀行全球投資者,Inc.爲第二和第三大股東。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 22 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記表看,前22名股東控制着50%的股權,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有絕對控股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Lam Research
拉姆研究的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Lam Research Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$282m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據顯示,拉姆研究公司內部人員直接擁有不到1%的股份。由於這是一家大公司,我們只希望內部人員擁有很小的一部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有總值28200萬美元的股票。董事會成員持有股份是件好事,但也值得查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lam Research. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
擁有13%股權的普通投資者,主要是個人投資者,對拉姆研究有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體並不能決定一切,但確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。