Tutor Perini Corporation's (NYSE:TPC) Institutional Investors Lost 9.8% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Tutor Perini Corporation's (NYSE:TPC) Institutional Investors Lost 9.8% Over the Past Week but Have Profited From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Tutor Perini implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
- Insiders own 17% of Tutor Perini
- 機構持有tutor perini的大量股份意味着他們對該公司的股價有重大影響
- 前9大股東持有公司的51%股份。
- 內部持有17%的tutor perini
Every investor in Tutor Perini Corporation (NYSE:TPC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 71% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
紐交所:TPC)的每位投資者都應意識到最強大的股東團體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司71%的所有權。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 9.8% last week. Still, the 269% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
對於投資損失股東都不喜歡,尤其是上週看到其持倉價值下跌9.8%的機構投資者。然而,269%的一年漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。他們應該注意未來可能進一步的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Tutor Perini, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究每種類型的tutor perini所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tutor Perini?
機構持股告訴我們tutor perini的什麼情況?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Tutor Perini does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Tutor Perini, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到tutor perini確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這表明該公司在投資社區有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查tutor perini過去的收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Tutor Perini. The company's CEO Ronald Tutor is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. With 9.2% and 6.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Donald Smith & Co., Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應該注意,實際上有超過一半的公司股份被機構持有,因此他們可以共同行使重要的影響力。對於Tutor Perini,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。公司首席執行官羅納德·圖特持有14%的股份,是最大的股東。BlackRock,Inc.和Donald Smith&Co.,Inc.分別持有公司9.2%和6.2%的股份,分別是第二和第三大股東。
We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了進一步的挖掘,並發現前9大股東持有該公司股份的51%左右,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好禮。該股票受到的分析師覆蓋範圍很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空間獲得更多的覆蓋範圍。
Insider Ownership Of Tutor Perini
Tutor Perini的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Tutor Perini Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.4b, and insiders have US$228m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士擁有Tutor Perini Corporation相當比例的股份。 其市值僅爲14億美元,內部人士個人名下的股票價值爲22800萬美元。這相當顯著。 大多數人會說,這顯示了與股東良好的利益契合,尤其是在這樣規模的公司。 您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Tutor Perini. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通投資者擁有12%的所有權,其中大部分是個人投資者,對Tutor Perini有一定的影響力。 雖然這一所有權比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Tutor Perini has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,風險- tutor perini有一個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。