Is Haemonetics (NYSE:HAE) Using Too Much Debt?
Is Haemonetics (NYSE:HAE) Using Too Much Debt?
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. As with many other companies Haemonetics Corporation (NYSE:HAE) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
當David Iben說'波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本永久損失'時,他表達得很好。因此,聰明的資金似乎知道,債務在破產時通常涉及,是評估公司風險程度時非常重要的因素。與許多其他公司一樣,美國血液技術公司(NYSE:HAE)利用債務。但更重要的問題是:這種債務正在帶來多大風險呢?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業發展的工具,但如果企業無法償還債權人的債務,那麼它存在於債權人的控制之下。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法定義務,股東可能一無所有。然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,公司必須以較低的價格籌集新的股本資金,從而永久稀釋股東。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長,沒有任何負面後果。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先關注現金和債務兩者的情況。
How Much Debt Does Haemonetics Carry?
美國血液技術負債多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Haemonetics had debt of US$1.22b, up from US$765.0m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$346.1m, its net debt is less, at about US$877.5m.
下面的圖片,您可以點擊查看更詳細的信息,顯示2024年6月,美國血液技術的債務爲12.2億美元,比一年前的76500萬美元增加。然而,由於它有34610萬美元的現金儲備,其淨債務較低,約爲87750萬美元。
A Look At Haemonetics' Liabilities
審視美國血液技術的負債
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Haemonetics had liabilities of US$260.1m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$1.38b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$346.1m as well as receivables valued at US$201.5m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.09b.
深入研究最新資產負債表數據,我們可以看到美國血液技術有着在12個月內到期的26010萬美元的負債,以及13.8億美元的超過該期限的負債。抵消這些義務的是,它擁有價值爲34610萬美元的現金以及12個月內到期的應收賬款價值爲20150萬美元。因此,其負債超過現金和(近期)應收賬款總和達到了10.9億美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Haemonetics has a market capitalization of US$3.88b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.
儘管這看起來很多,但由於美國血液技術的市值爲38.8億美元,所以如果有需要,它可能通過增加資本來加強其資產負債表。然而,仍值得仔細看看其償還債務的能力。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。
Haemonetics has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.8, which signals significant debt, but is still pretty reasonable for most types of business. But its EBIT was about 11.2 times its interest expense, implying the company isn't really paying a high cost to maintain that level of debt. Even were the low cost to prove unsustainable, that is a good sign. One way Haemonetics could vanquish its debt would be if it stops borrowing more but continues to grow EBIT at around 16%, as it did over the last year. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Haemonetics's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
美國血液技術的債務與EBITDA比率爲2.8,這表明有着可觀的債務,但對於大多數業務來說還是相當合理的。但其EBIT大約是利息費用的11.2倍,這意味着公司並沒有花費很高的成本來維持那個債務水平。即使低成本最終不可持續,這也是一個好跡象。美國血液技術擺脫債務的一種方法就是停止借債增加,但繼續讓EBIT以約16%的速度增長,就像過去一年所做的那樣。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是一個明顯的起點。然而,未來的收益遠比其他任何事情更能決定美國血液技術保持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您想知道專業人士的看法,您可能會對分析師利潤預測的這份免費報告感興趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Haemonetics produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 60% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
最後,雖然稅務部門可能熱愛會計利潤,但貸款方只接受冷硬現金。因此,我們明顯需要看看那個EBIT是否帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年裏,美國血液技術產生了堅實的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的60%,大約是我們所預期的。這筆冷硬現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Haemonetics's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. But truth be told we feel its net debt to EBITDA does undermine this impression a bit. It's also worth noting that Haemonetics is in the Medical Equipment industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. Taking all this data into account, it seems to us that Haemonetics takes a pretty sensible approach to debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Haemonetics (of which 1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) you should know about.
美國血液技術的利息償付能力表明其可以像克里斯蒂亞諾·羅納爾多輕鬆進球一樣應付債務。 但實話實說,我們認爲其淨債務/EBITDA比有些削弱了這種印象。 值得注意的是,美國血液技術屬於醫療設備行業,通常被認爲是相當防禦性的。 綜合考慮所有這些數據,我們認爲美國血液技術在處理債務方面採取了相當明智的做法。 這意味着他們承擔了更多風險,希望提高股東回報。 毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上學到了大部分關於債務的知識。 然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。 這些風險很難發現。 每家公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現了美國血液技術的2個預警信號(其中1個讓我們有些不舒服!),這是您應該了解的。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。