Does Pagaya Technologies (NASDAQ:PGY) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Pagaya Technologies (NASDAQ:PGY) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ:PGY) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
傳奇基金經理李錄(得到查理;芒格的支持)曾說過: '最大的投資風險不是價格的波動性,而是您是否會遭受永久性的資本損失。' 當我們考慮一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是喜歡看看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過載可能導致毀滅。 與許多其他公司一樣,Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (納斯達克:PGY)會使用債務。 但更重要的問題是: 這筆債務造成了多大風險?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
當企業無法輕鬆履行債務或以有吸引力的價格融資時,債務和其他負債對企業變得風險。 如果情況變得真的很糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。 然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是它必須以低價籌集新的股本資金,從而永久稀釋股東。 當然,許多公司使用債務來資助增長,而沒有任何負面後果。 在考慮一家公司的債務水平時的第一步是考慮其現金和債務的總和。
How Much Debt Does Pagaya Technologies Carry?
Pagaya Technologies承擔了多少債務?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2024 Pagaya Technologies had US$632.8m of debt, an increase on US$306.6m, over one year. However, it does have US$235.3m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$397.6m.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但數據顯示,截至2024年6月,Pagaya Technologies的債務爲63280萬美元,比去年增加了30660萬美元。 然而,它擁有23530萬美元的現金來抵消這一筆債務,導致淨負債約39760萬美元。
How Strong Is Pagaya Technologies' Balance Sheet?
Pagaya Technologies的資產負債表有多強?根據最後公佈的資產負債表,Pagaya Technologies有US$16940萬的負債到期,這些負債在12個月內到期,以及US$51360萬的負債在12個月後到期。抵銷這些義務,它有US$27580萬的現金,以及價值US$8740萬的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債超過了其現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和31990萬美元。
According to the last reported balance sheet, Pagaya Technologies had liabilities of US$241.3m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$521.9m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$235.3m as well as receivables valued at US$99.9m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$428.0m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
根據最近披露的資產負債表,Pagaya Technologies的負債中,有24130萬美元應於12個月內到期,有52190萬美元應超過12個月到期。 抵消這些義務,它手頭有23530萬美元的現金,以及價值9990萬美元應於12個月內到期的應收賬款。 因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的組合多42800萬美元。
Pagaya Technologies has a market capitalization of US$877.8m, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.
Pagaya Technologies的市值爲87780萬美元,因此很可能籌集資金以改善其資產負債表,如果需要的話。 但很明顯,我們應該密切關注它是否能夠在不稀釋的情況下管理債務。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
BJ批發俱樂部控股公司的淨債務只有EBITDA的0.62倍。而其EBIT輕鬆覆蓋其利息費用,比例爲12.6倍。因此,我們對其超級保守的債務使用感到相當放心。雖然BJ批發俱樂部控股公司在EBIT方面沒有取得太多進展,但至少其盈利保持穩定。當分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯然的切入點。但歸根結底,企業未來的盈利能力將決定BJ批發俱樂部控股公司能否隨着時間的推移加強資產負債表。因此,如果你要關注未來,可以查看一下這份免費的分析報告,了解分析師的盈利預測。
Strangely Pagaya Technologies has a sky high EBITDA ratio of 8.3, implying high debt, but a strong interest coverage of 1k. So either it has access to very cheap long term debt or that interest expense is going to grow! Notably, Pagaya Technologies made a loss at the EBIT level, last year, but improved that to positive EBIT of US$24m in the last twelve months. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Pagaya Technologies's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
奇怪的是,Pagaya Technologies有一個極高的EBITDA比率爲8.3,暗示高負債,但利息保障率強勁爲0.1萬。 因此,要麼它擁有非常便宜的長期債務,要麼利息支出將增長! 需要注意的是,Pagaya Technologies去年在EBIT水平上虧損,但在過去十二個月裏將其提升爲2400萬美元的積極EBIT。 當您分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是要重點關注的領域。 但更重要的是未來收入,而不是任何其他事情,將決定Pagaya Technologies未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。 因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it is important to check how much of its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) converts to actual free cash flow. Happily for any shareholders, Pagaya Technologies actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last year. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.
最後,雖然稅務部門可能歡迎會計利潤,但放貸方只接受冰冷的現金。 因此,檢查其息稅前利潤(EBIT)轉化爲實際自由現金流的比例是很重要的。 令股東高興的是,Pagaya Technologies實際上在過去一年內產生的自由現金流比EBIt多。 這種強勁的現金轉化效果使我們就像在Daft Punk音樂會上節拍落下時的人群一樣興奮。
Our View
我們的觀點
Pagaya Technologies's net debt to EBITDA was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. There's no doubt that its ability to to cover its interest expense with its EBIT is pretty flash. Considering this range of data points, we think Pagaya Technologies is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Pagaya Technologies you should know about.
Pagaya Technologies的淨債務/EBITDA在這項分析中確實是一個真正的負面因素,儘管我們考慮的其他因素要好得多。毫無疑問,它用EBIt覆蓋利息支出的能力相當突出。考慮到這一系列數據點,我們認爲Pagaya Technologies有能力管理其債務水平。但需要提醒的是:我們認爲債務水平高到足以證明需要繼續監測。資產負債表顯然是在分析債務時需要重點關注的地方。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。這些風險很難發現。每家公司都會有,我們已經發現了Pagaya Technologies的3個警示信號,你應該知道。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。