share_log

With 68% Institutional Ownership, Cincinnati Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CINF) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 68% Institutional Ownership, Cincinnati Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CINF) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

擁有68%的機構持股,辛辛納提金融公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CINF)是大戶們的最愛。
Simply Wall St ·  10/28 18:42

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Cincinnati Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構在辛辛納提金融的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
  • 共有25位投資者擁有這家公司48%的所有權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

Every investor in Cincinnati Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:CINF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 68% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

辛辛納提金融公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CINF)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。 這家公司持有最多股份的群體,準確地說約佔公司股份的68%,是機構。 換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cincinnati Financial.

讓我們仔細看看,不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關辛辛納提金融的什麼。

big
NasdaqGS:CINF Ownership Breakdown October 28th 2024
NasdaqGS:CINF所有權拆分2024年10月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cincinnati Financial?

機構所有權告訴我們有關辛辛納提金融的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Cincinnati Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cincinnati Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,辛辛納提金融確實有機構投資者; 他們持有該公司的大部分股票。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。 但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。 如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售一隻股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。 因此,值得檢查辛辛納提金融的過去收益軌跡(下文)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:CINF Earnings and Revenue Growth October 28th 2024
納斯達克GS:辛辛納提金融公司2024年10月28日的盈利和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Cincinnati Financial is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.9% and 5.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要的影響力。辛辛納提金融公司不受對沖基金的持有。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是公司最大的股東,持有公司12%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有公司未流通股份的7.9%和5.8%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Cincinnati Financial

辛辛納提金融公司的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Cincinnati Financial Corporation. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$392m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部股東持有辛辛納提金融公司的股份。這是一家非常龐大的公司,董事會成員共持有價值39200萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會對他們是在買入還是賣出感興趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 30% stake in Cincinnati Financial. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般大衆,通常是個人投資者,在辛辛納提金融持有30%的股份。儘管這一所有權規模可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Cincinnati Financial has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

我覺得查看公司的具體股東非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例 - 辛辛納提金融有 1 個警告標誌 我們認爲你應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論