share_log

Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of First Community Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:FCBC) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 6.7% Decrease

Both Retail Investors Who Control a Good Portion of First Community Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:FCBC) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 6.7% Decrease

持有第一社區銀行股份股份的零售投資者以及機構在上週的6.7%下跌後都感到沮喪
Simply Wall St ·  10/26 20:33

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in First Community Bankshares indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
  • Insiders own 11% of First Community Bankshares
  • 第一社區銀行股份的零售投資者持有大量股份,這表明他們在管理和業務策略方面共同擁有更大的發言權。
  • 前 25 名股東擁有該公司的 46%。
  • 內部人士擁有第一社區銀行股份的11%。

A look at the shareholders of First Community Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:FCBC) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看第一社區銀行股份,Inc.(納斯達克:FCBC)的股東,就可以告訴我們哪個群體最有實力。我們可以看到零售投資者在公司中佔有48%的股權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 6.7% price drop, institutions with their 35% holdings also suffered.

上週股價下跌6.7%後,零售投資者的持股遭受打擊,擁有35%持股的機構也受到影響。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of First Community Bankshares, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究第一社區銀行股份的每種所有者類型,從下面圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:FCBC Ownership Breakdown October 26th 2024
納斯達克FCBC所有權拆分2024年10月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Community Bankshares?

機構所有權告訴我們有關第一社區銀行股份的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in First Community Bankshares. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at First Community Bankshares' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所見,機構投資者在第一社區銀行股份中持有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,依賴機構投資者所謂的認可要謹慎。它們有時也會出錯。 如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面第一社區銀行股份的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:FCBC Earnings and Revenue Growth October 26th 2024
納斯達克GS:FCBC第一社區銀行股份2024年10月26日營收和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in First Community Bankshares. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.3% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.3% and 4.9% of the stock. In addition, we found that William Stafford, the CEO has 1.2% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到,對第一社區銀行股份的投資並不具有實質意義。 我們的數據顯示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股東,持有8.3%的股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.3%和4.9%的股份。 此外,我們發現CEO威廉·斯塔福德名下擁有1.2%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加研究價值,但研究分析師建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一個好習慣。該股票的一些分析人士需要更多的關注時間。

Insider Ownership Of First Community Bankshares

第一社區銀行股份的內部人所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in First Community Bankshares, Inc.. Insiders have a US$87m stake in this US$772m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示內部人士在第一社區銀行股份公司持有大量股份。內部人士在這家總價值77200萬美元的企業中持有8,700萬美元的股份。這可能意味着創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 48% stake in First Community Bankshares. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通投資者通常是個人投資者,在第一社區銀行股份中持有48%的股份。雖然佔有比例相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - First Community Bankshares has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

我發現了解一家公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例 - 第一社區銀行股份有一個警告標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論