Institutional Investors in Lakeland Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:LKFN) See US$91m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Institutional Investors in Lakeland Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:LKFN) See US$91m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lakeland Financial's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
- Insiders have bought recently
- 機構持股比例顯著高,意味着萊克蘭金融的股價對它們的交易行爲敏感
- 前9大股東持有該業務的50%。
- 內部人士最近購買了股票。
If you want to know who really controls Lakeland Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:LKFN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想了解誰真正控制着萊克蘭金融公司(納斯達克:LKFN),那麼你就需要看看它的股東名冊構成。持有最大份額的是擁有84%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個群體將從中受益最多(或者在股價下跌時損失最多)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$91m last week. However, the 36% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
上週公司市值下降了9100萬美元, 機構投資者遭受了最高的損失。然而,36%的年度回報可能有助於緩解他們的整體損失。然而,他們應該謹慎未來可能的進一步損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lakeland Financial.
讓我們仔細觀察一下,看看萊克蘭金融的不同股東類型能告訴我們什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lakeland Financial?
機構所有權告訴我們什麼有關萊克蘭金融?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Lakeland Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lakeland Financial's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到萊克蘭金融確實有機構投資者; 他們持有公司的股票的一大部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們很喜歡。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能錯。 當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總有一個風險,即它們處於「擁擠的交易」中。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到萊克蘭金融的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事還有更多內容。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lakeland Financial. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.2% and 6.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that David Findlay, the CEO has 0.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。對沖基金在萊克蘭金融的股份不多。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是BlackRock, Inc.,持有14%的流通股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的7.2%和6.0%。此外,我們發現CEO David Findlay名下擁有0.5%的股份。
We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前9大股東持有超過股份註冊的一半,還有一些小股東平衡大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Lakeland Financial
萊克蘭金融的內部股權所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in Lakeland Financial Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$49m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到,內部持有萊克蘭金融公司的股份。這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性是件好事。內部持有價值4900萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部一致性問題,您可以單擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有該公司的13%股份,因此不容忽視。雖然該群體不能決定,但肯定會對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Lakeland Financial , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。比如,投資風險這個始終存在的鬼魅。我們已經發現了萊克蘭金融存在1個警告信號,理解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。