Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CBSH) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 72% of the Company
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CBSH) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 72% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Commerce Bancshares' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 機構擁有的股權佔比較高,意味着科默斯銀行的股價對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 前10大股東持有50%的股份。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:CBSH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 72% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解真正控制科默斯銀行股票的是誰,重要的是要了解該業務的所有權結構。擁有最大股份的是擁有72%股權的機構群體。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對這家公司的投資中獲得最大利潤(或蒙受最大損失)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Commerce Bancshares, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解科默斯銀行每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Commerce Bancshares?
機構持股告訴我們有關科默斯銀行的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Commerce Bancshares. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Commerce Bancshares' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您可以看到的,機構投資者在科默斯銀行擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經觀察了這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看一下科默斯銀行的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Commerce Bancshares. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.8% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.5% by the third-largest shareholder.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會共同對董事會決策產生強大影響。我們注意到,對於科默斯銀行而言,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有9.8%的流通股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.5%的流通股份,第三大股東持有6.5%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了更深入的挖掘,並發現前10大股東約佔註冊表的50%,這意味着除了大股東以外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Commerce Bancshares
科默斯銀行內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Commerce Bancshares, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$234m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股東可能會對了解到科默斯銀行的內部持有股份感興趣。內部持有者持有價值爲23400萬美元的股份。大多數人會將此視爲真正的積極因素。看到內部持有者投資到這個程度是件好事。您可以在這裏查看內部持有者最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司19%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略他們。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以在其利益方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 5.7%, of the Commerce Bancshares stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
科默斯銀行股份中,私人公司擁有5.7%。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得進一步了解擁有這些私人公司的人。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過獨立的私人公司持有公共公司股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Commerce Bancshares that you should be aware of before investing here.
我發現查看公司所有者是非常有趣的。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了對科默斯銀行的1個警告信號,你在投資之前應該知曉。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。