share_log

There Are Some Holes In Capital Clean Energy Carriers' (NASDAQ:CCEC) Solid Earnings Release

There Are Some Holes In Capital Clean Energy Carriers' (NASDAQ:CCEC) Solid Earnings Release

資本清潔能源運營商(納斯達克:CCEC)的盈利報告中存在一些漏洞
Simply Wall St ·  10/24 02:51

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp.'s (NASDAQ:CCEC) stock performed strongly after the recent earnings report. Despite this, we feel that there are some reasons to be cautious with these earnings.

納斯達克股票代碼爲CCEC的Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. 在最近的收益報告後表現強勁。儘管如此,我們認爲在這些收益方面存在一些謹慎的理由。

big
NasdaqGS:CCEC Earnings and Revenue History October 23rd 2024
納斯達克GS:CCEC收益和營業收入歷史記錄2024年10月23日

Zooming In On Capital Clean Energy Carriers' Earnings

深入研究Capital Clean Energy Carriers的收益情況

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

在高端金融領域,用來衡量公司將報告利潤轉爲自由現金流(FCF)的關鍵比率是來自現金流的應計比率。爲了得到應計比率,我們首先計算某一時期的FCF和利潤之差,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均經營資產。可以將來自現金流的應計比率視爲「非FCF獲利比率」。

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

這意味着負的計提比率是一件好事,因爲它表明公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所暗示的要多。雖然擁有正的計提比率毫無問題,表明某種程度的非現金利潤,但高的計提比率則是一個壞信號,因爲這表明紙面利潤與現金流不匹配。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,高的計提比率對近期利潤總體上是一個壞兆頭。

Over the twelve months to June 2024, Capital Clean Energy Carriers recorded an accrual ratio of 0.59. As a general rule, that bodes poorly for future profitability. And indeed, during the period the company didn't produce any free cash flow whatsoever. Even though it reported a profit of US$96.3m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through US$946m in the last year. Coming off the back of negative free cash flow last year, we imagine some shareholders might wonder if its cash burn of US$946m, this year, indicates high risk. Having said that, there is more to consider. We must also consider the impact of unusual items on statutory profit (and thus the accrual ratio), as well as note the ramifications of the company issuing new shares.

在截至2024年6月的十二個月內,Capital Clean Energy Carriers錄得了0.59的預提比率。一般來說,這對未來的盈利前景不利。確實,在此期間公司並沒有產生任何自由現金流。儘管它報告了9630萬美元的利潤,但從自由現金流來看,實際上它在上一年度穿透了94600萬美元。從去年的負自由現金流出發,我們想象一些股東可能會懷疑,今年的94600萬美元現金消耗是否暗示着高風險。但話雖如此,還有更多要考慮的。我們還必須考慮飛凡項目對法定利潤(從而是預提比率)的影響,以及注意公司發行新股的後果。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。

In order to understand the potential for per share returns, it is essential to consider how much a company is diluting shareholders. As it happens, Capital Clean Energy Carriers issued 193% more new shares over the last year. As a result, its net income is now split between a greater number of shares. To talk about net income, without noticing earnings per share, is to be distracted by the big numbers while ignoring the smaller numbers that talk to per share value. You can see a chart of Capital Clean Energy Carriers' EPS by clicking here.

爲了了解每股收益的潛力,必須考慮公司正在如何稀釋股東。事實上,Capital Clean Energy Carriers過去一年發行了更多的新股,增加了193%。因此,其淨收入現在分攤在更多股份之間。談論淨收入,而不注意每股收益,則是被大數字分散注意力,忽略了表達每股價值的小數字。您可以點擊這裏查看Capital Clean Energy Carriers的EPS圖表。

A Look At The Impact Of Capital Clean Energy Carriers' Dilution On Its Earnings Per Share (EPS)

觀察Capital Clean Energy Carriers的稀釋對其每股收益(EPS)的影響

As you can see above, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has been growing its net income over the last few years, with an annualized gain of 64% over three years. But on the other hand, earnings per share actually fell by 23% per year. And in the last year the company managed to bump profit up by 3.4%. But that's starkly different from the 48% drop in earnings per share. And so, you can see quite clearly that dilution is having a rather significant impact on shareholders.

正如您可以在上面看到的,Capital Clean Energy Carriers在過去幾年裏一直在增加淨收入,年化增長率爲64%。但另一方面,每股收益實際上每年下降23%。並且在過去一年,公司設法將利潤增加了3.4%。但這與每股收益下降48%形成鮮明對比。因此,您可以清楚地看到,稀釋對股東正在產生相當顯著的影響。

In the long term, if Capital Clean Energy Carriers' earnings per share can increase, then the share price should too. But on the other hand, we'd be far less excited to learn profit (but not EPS) was improving. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.

長期而言,如果Capital Clean Energy Carriers的每股收益能夠增加,那麼股價也應該會上漲。但另一方面,我們發現公司盈利(但不是EPS)的改善可能不會讓我們感到激動。出於這個原因,您可以說EPS在長期內比淨收入更爲重要,假設目標是評估公司的股價可能增長。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

非常規項目如何影響利潤?

Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that Capital Clean Energy Carriers' profit was boosted by unusual items worth US$28m in the last twelve months. While it's always nice to have higher profit, a large contribution from unusual items sometimes dampens our enthusiasm. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. Assuming those unusual items don't show up again in the current year, we'd thus expect profit to be weaker next year (in the absence of business growth, that is).

考慮到計提比率,Capital Clean Energy Carriers在過去十二個月中的利潤大幅增加了價值爲2800萬美元的飛凡項目。雖然盈利提升總是件好事,但飛凡項目的大幅貢獻有時會降低我們的熱情。當我們分析成千上萬家上市公司的數據時,我們發現,某年度飛凡項目的提升往往不會在下一年重演。畢竟,這正是會計術語所暗示的。假設這些飛凡項目在當年不再出現,那麼我們預計下一年的利潤會較弱(在沒有業務增長的情況下)。

Our Take On Capital Clean Energy Carriers' Profit Performance

我們對Capital Clean Energy Carriers的利潤表現進行了評估

Capital Clean Energy Carriers didn't back up its earnings with free cashflow, but this isn't too surprising given profits were inflated by unusual items. Meanwhile, the new shares issued mean that shareholders now own less of the company, unless they tipped in more cash themselves. On reflection, the above-mentioned factors give us the strong impression that Capital Clean Energy Carriers'underlying earnings power is not as good as it might seem, based on the statutory profit numbers. If you want to do dive deeper into Capital Clean Energy Carriers, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Capital Clean Energy Carriers (4 don't sit too well with us) you should be familiar with.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers沒有用自由現金流支持其盈利,但這並不令人太驚訝,因爲利潤被飛凡項目膨脹。同時,發行的新股意味着股東現在擁有的公司份額較少,除非他們自己投入了更多現金。 總的來說,上述因素讓我們堅信Capital Clean Energy Carriers的基本盈利能力並不像表面看起來那麼好,這是根據法定利潤數字判斷的。 如果你想深入了解Capital Clean Energy Carriers,你還應該研究它目前面臨的風險。例如,我們已經確定了5個Capital Clean Energy Carriers的風險警示(其中有4個我們並不太滿意),你應該熟悉。

In this article we've looked at a number of factors that can impair the utility of profit numbers, and we've come away cautious. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

在本文中,我們已經查看了許多影響利潤數據實用性的因素,並對此持謹慎態度。但是,還有許多其他方法可以了解公司的情況。例如,許多人認爲高股權回報率是企業經濟有利的指標,而其他人則喜歡「跟着錢」的思路,並尋找內部人員購買的股票。雖然這可能需要一些您自己的研究,但是您可能會發現這個由高股權回報率的公司組成的免費集合,或者這個擁有重要內部人員持股的股票列表有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論