share_log

Blend Labs, Inc.'s (NYSE:BLND) Institutional Investors Lost 10.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Blend Labs, Inc.'s (NYSE:BLND) Institutional Investors Lost 10.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Blend Labs, Inc.(紐交所:BLND)的機構投資者上週虧損了10.0%,但從長期收益中受益。
Simply Wall St ·  10/22 22:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Blend Labs' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構擁有的股權高度意味着Blend Labs的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 該公司共有14個投資者擁有其51%的多數股權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Blend Labs, Inc. (NYSE:BLND), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 42% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着Blend Labs,Inc.(NYSE:BLND),重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。 機構擁有42%的股份,在公司中持有最多的股份。 換句話說,該組面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$915m last week. However, the 175% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週,該公司市值下跌至91500萬美元后,機構投資者是受影響最嚴重的群體。然而,股東們獲得的175%一年回報可能有所緩解。然而,他們應該警惕未來進一步的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Blend Labs.

讓我們更仔細地看一下,看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Blend Labs的什麼信息。

big
NYSE:BLND Ownership Breakdown October 22nd 2024
紐交所:BLND 擁有情況拆分於2024年10月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Blend Labs?

機構的所有權結構可以告訴我們關於Blend Labs的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Blend Labs does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Blend Labs, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到Blend Labs確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者所附帶的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一支股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得查看Blend Labs的過去收益軌跡(下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:BLND Earnings and Revenue Growth October 22nd 2024
紐交所:BLND2024年10月22日業績和營業收入增長

Blend Labs is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is General Atlantic Service Company, L.P., with ownership of 7.5%. Formation8 Partners, LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 6.4% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.8% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Nima Ghamsari is the owner of 3.6% of the company's shares.

Blend Labs不是由對沖基金所擁有。該公司最大的股東是General Atlantic Service Company,持有7.5%的股份。Formation8 Partners, LLC是第二大股東,擁有6.4%的普通股,而The Vanguard Group, Inc.持有該公司股份約5.8%。此外,CEO Nima Ghamsari擁有公司股份的3.6%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的調查,我們發現前14名股東持有該公司的51%的股份,這表明沒有單一的股東對該公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Blend Labs

Blend Labs的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Blend Labs, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$915m, and insiders have US$54m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有一些Blend Labs, Inc.的股份。其市值僅爲91500萬美元,內部人士名下持有價值5400萬美元的股份。這至少顯示出了一定的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 38% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Blend Labs. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有38%股權的普通大衆,主要包括個人投資者,對Blend Labs的影響力頗大。雖然這一群體不能決定一切,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實質影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 14% stake in Blend Labs. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

股權投資公司持有Blend Labs 14%的股份。這意味着他們在關鍵政策決策中可能有影響力。有時我們會看到股權投資公司長揸股份,但一般來說,他們的投資週期較短,不像名字所示那樣投資於公共公司。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售股份並將資金重新配置到其他地方。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Blend Labs you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體值得一提,但有其他更重要的因素。考慮風險,例如。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現了Blend Labs的3個警示信號,您應該了解。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論