Institutional Owners May Ignore NBT Bancorp Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NBTB) Recent US$67m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore NBT Bancorp Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NBTB) Recent US$67m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in NBT Bancorp implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構在nbt bancorp的大量持股意味着它們對公司股價有重大影響
- 共有17家投資者持有該公司的大部分股權,佔51%的所有權。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
To get a sense of who is truly in control of NBT Bancorp Inc. (NASDAQ:NBTB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 63% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着NBt Bancorp Inc.(納斯達克:NBTB),重要的是了解企業的所有權結構。 機構持有63%的股份,是公司中擁有最多股份的。 換句話說,如果股價上漲(或者如果股價下跌),該集團將獲益最多(或者損失最多)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.1% in value last week. However, the 45% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
沒有股東喜歡在他們的投資上虧錢,尤其是機構投資者上週看到他們的持股價值下降了3.1%。然而,45%的一年回報可能已經有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但他們可能會對未來的損失感到擔憂。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of NBT Bancorp.
在下圖表中,我們來看一下NBt bancorp不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NBT Bancorp?
機構所有權告訴我們有關nbt bancorp的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
NBT Bancorp already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at NBT Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
nbt bancorp已經在股東名冊上擁有機構。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,股價可能會快速下跌。因此,值得查看以下nbt bancorp的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in NBT Bancorp. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 4.9% of the stock.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要影響力。對於nbt bancorp,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股東,持有14%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約12%和4.9%的股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東註冊表上看,我們可以看到前17名股東控制了51%的股份所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權所有權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of NBT Bancorp
nbt bancorp的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in NBT Bancorp Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$64m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股東們可能會對了解內部人士在nbt bancorp公司擁有股份感興趣。 這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性是件好事。 內部人士擁有價值6400萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 看到內部人士投資的這一水平是件好事。 您可以點擊此處查看這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over NBT Bancorp. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
擁有34%所有權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在nbt bancorp擁有一定程度的影響力。 儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以左右一項政策決定偏袒他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with NBT Bancorp , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我發現了解公司股權結構非常有趣。 但要真正獲得深入見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。 例如,投資風險這個永遠存在的魅影。 我們已經確定了1個有關nbt bancorp的警示標誌,並理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。