share_log

Institutional Investors Are The Southern Company's (NYSE:SO) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$3.7b Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are The Southern Company's (NYSE:SO) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$3.7b Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是南方公司(紐交所:SO)的最大賭注者,上週市值增加了37億美元后獲得了回報
Simply Wall St ·  10/21 18:42

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Southern's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 48% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構持股比例顯著高,這意味着南方公司的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 該公司前 25 名股東擁有該公司的 48%。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of The Southern Company (NYSE:SO) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 67% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看南方公司(紐交所:SO)的股東就可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。機構擁有67%的股份,在公司中持股最多。換句話說,這個群體會從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或者損失最多)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$102b in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 48% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週,公司市值達到1020億美元后,機構投資者成爲最大受益者。股東的年度回報率目前爲48%,而上週的收益更是錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Southern.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注Southern的不同所有權集團。

big
NYSE:SO Ownership Breakdown October 21st 2024
紐交所:SO 2024年10月21日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Southern?

機構持股情況對Southern意味着什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Southern does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Southern's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Southern確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中擁有一定的信譽度。然而,最好警惕依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時會出錯。當多家機構擁有某隻股票時,總是存在它們在一場'擁擠交易'中的風險。當這樣的交易出問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到Southern的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加複雜。

big
NYSE:SO Earnings and Revenue Growth October 21st 2024
2024年10月21日紐約證券交易所:SO收益和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Southern. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.2% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.1% and 5.2% of the stock.

投資者應該注意,實際上有超過一半的股份被機構持有,因此他們可以共同施加重要影響力。對於南部公司,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。目前The Vanguard Group, Inc. 是該公司最大的股東,持有9.2% 的股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約7.1% 和5.2% 的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Southern

南方公司的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of The Southern Company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$182m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有人擁有南方公司不到1%的股份。由於公司規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部持有人擁有大比例的股票。總共,他們擁有價值18200萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,看看這些內部持有人是在買入還是賣出可能會更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆--包括散戶股東--擁有公司33%的股權,因此他們無法輕易被忽略。儘管這種所有權尺寸可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Southern has 3 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如承擔風險 - 南方公司有3個警示信號(還有1個不容忽視的),我們認爲您應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論