share_log

Landsea Homes (NASDAQ:LSEA) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

Landsea Homes (NASDAQ:LSEA) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

Landsea Homes(納斯達克:LSEA)的債務使用可能被視爲有風險
Simply Wall St ·  10/19 22:47

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Landsea Homes Corporation (NASDAQ:LSEA) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

霍華德·馬克斯在談到股價波動時表達得非常到位,他說,『我擔心的不是股價波動,而是永久性損失的可能性... 我認識的每個實際投資者都擔心這一點。』 當您評估公司的風險性時,考慮到債務往往是業務崩潰時經常涉及的因素,查看公司的資產負債表就顯得十分自然。與許多其他公司一樣,Landsea Homes Corporation(納斯達克股票代碼:LSEA)利用債務。 但真正的問題是,這種債務是否使公司風險增加。

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕易償還時才成爲真正的問題,要麼通過籌集資本,要麼通過公司自身的現金流。 資本主義的重要組成部分是「創造性破壞」過程,失敗的企業被銀行家無情地清算。 但更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是公司必須以低價稀釋股東權益,只是爲了控制債務。 然而,通過代替稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業的極好工具。 當我們考慮公司的債務使用時,我們首先關注現金和債務的總量。

How Much Debt Does Landsea Homes Carry?

Landsea Homes承擔了多少債務?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2024, Landsea Homes had US$754.1m of debt, up from US$482.7m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have US$82.2m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$672.0m.

正如您在下面所見,截至2024年6月底,Landsea Homes的債務爲75410萬元美元,比一年前的48270萬元美元有所增加。 點擊圖像了解更多詳細信息。 然而,它確實有8220萬元美元現金來抵消這筆債務,導致淨債務約爲67200萬元美元。

big
NasdaqCM:LSEA Debt to Equity History October 19th 2024
納斯達克資本市場:LSEA債務股權歷史數據2024年10月19日

A Look At Landsea Homes' Liabilities

看一下藍籌置業的負債情況

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Landsea Homes had liabilities of US$294.3m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$775.7m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$82.2m as well as receivables valued at US$7.17m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$980.7m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

從最近的資產負債表中我們可以看到,藍籌置業的到期負債爲29430萬美元,超過1年到期的負債爲77570萬美元。 抵消這些義務,它還有8220萬美元的現金以及12個月內到期的應收賬款價值爲717萬美元。 因此,它的負債總計爲98070萬美元,超過其現金和短期應收賬款的總和。

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$441.9m company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, Landsea Homes would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

這裏的赤字嚴重依靠這家44190萬美元的公司本身,就像一個孩子承擔着滿是書的巨大揹包,他的體育裝備和一個喇叭的重量。 因此,毫無疑問,我們將密切關注其資產負債表。 畢竟,如果藍籌置業今天必須償付債務,那麼它很可能需要進行大規模的再資本化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

Strangely Landsea Homes has a sky high EBITDA ratio of 10.8, implying high debt, but a strong interest coverage of 1k. So either it has access to very cheap long term debt or that interest expense is going to grow! Shareholders should be aware that Landsea Homes's EBIT was down 46% last year. If that decline continues then paying off debt will be harder than selling foie gras at a vegan convention. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Landsea Homes's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

奇怪的是,藍籌置業的EBITDA比率之高達10.8,意味着高債務,但強大的利息償付覆蓋率卻只有0.1萬。 所以要麼它有獲取非常便宜的長期債務的能力,要麼利息開支將增加! 股東們應該意識到,藍籌置業去年的EBIT下降了46%。 如果這種下降繼續,那麼償還債務將比在素食大會上賣鵝肝更加困難。 當您分析債務時,負債表顯然是要重點關注的領域。 但最終,最重要的還是未來的盈利,這將決定藍籌置業未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。 因此,如果您想知道專業人士的看法,您可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, Landsea Homes's free cash flow amounted to 49% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

但我們最後的考慮也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤支付債務,它需要冷硬現金。 因此,值得查看EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。 在過去的三年中,藍籌置業的自由現金流相當於其EBIT的49%,低於我們的預期。 這種薄弱的現金轉換使處理負債更加困難。

Our View

我們的觀點

To be frank both Landsea Homes's EBIT growth rate and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But on the bright side, its interest cover is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Overall, it seems to us that Landsea Homes's balance sheet is really quite a risk to the business. For this reason we're pretty cautious about the stock, and we think shareholders should keep a close eye on its liquidity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Landsea Homes (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

坦率地說,蘭希住宅的EBIT增長率和其保持總負債優勢的記錄讓我們對其債務水平感到不安。但光明的是,其利息覆蓋率是一個好跡象,讓我們更加樂觀。總的來說,蘭希住宅的資產負債表對業務風險的影響似乎非常大。因此,我們對該股持謹慎態度,認爲股東們應該密切關注其流動性。資產負債表顯然是在分析債務時要重點關注的領域。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。例如,我們發現了蘭希住宅的4個警示信號(其中1條有點令人不悅!)在投資前您應該了解這些。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論