share_log

Retail Investors Are Hesai Group's (NASDAQ:HSAI) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$124m

Retail Investors Are Hesai Group's (NASDAQ:HSAI) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$124m

零售投資者是禾賽集團(納斯達克:HSAI)的最大股東,在市值下跌1.24億美元后遭受打擊。
Simply Wall St ·  10/19 00:01

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Hesai Group's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Hesai Group is 24%
  • 禾賽集團重要的散戶投資者持股表明關鍵決策受較大公衆股東影響
  • 業務的52%由8個最大的股東持有。
  • 禾賽集團內部持股比例爲24%

Every investor in Hesai Group (NASDAQ:HSAI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 25% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

納斯達克:HSAI中的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到散戶擁有公司25%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 18% price drop, insiders with their 24% also suffered.

零售投資者的持股在上週的18%價格下跌之後受到了打擊,而持股24%的內部人員也受到了影響。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hesai Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究禾賽集團的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:HSAI Ownership Breakdown October 18th 2024
納斯達克:HSAI 2024年10月18日的股權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hesai Group?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於禾賽集團?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Hesai Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hesai Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到禾賽集團確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總是存在它們會處於'交易過於繁忙'的風險。當這樣一個交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到禾賽集團的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加複雜。

big
NasdaqGS:HSAI Earnings and Revenue Growth October 18th 2024
納斯達克:禾賽2024年10月18日營收和收入增長

Hesai Group is not owned by hedge funds. Lightspeed Ventures, LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.4% of shares outstanding. Kai Sun is the second largest shareholder owning 8.0% of common stock, and Yifan Li holds about 7.8% of the company stock. Note that the second and third-largest shareholders are also Top Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, meaning that the company's top shareholders are insiders.

禾賽集團不是由對沖基金所擁有。Lightspeed Ventures, LLC目前是該公司最大的股東,持有8.4%的流通股份。凱·孫是第二大股東,擁有8.0%的普通股,而李一凡持有公司股份的約7.8%。請注意,第二和第三大股東也是董事會的高級主管和董事會成員,這意味着公司的頂級股東是內部人員。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Hesai Group

禾賽集團的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hesai Group. It has a market capitalization of just US$570m, and insiders have US$139m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士擁有禾賽集團合理比例的股份。市值僅爲57000萬美元,內部人士自有13900萬美元的股份。我們認爲這顯示了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能創立了這家企業。可以看這裏 查看這些內部人士是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hesai Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有25%的股權,一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對禾賽集團有一定影響力。雖然這種股權規模可能不足以左右有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 8.4%, private equity firms could influence the Hesai Group board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

擁有8.4%股權的股權投資公司可能會影響禾賽集團董事會。有時我們會看到股權投資公司長揸股份,但一般來說,他們的投資週期較短,並且——正如其名稱所示——不太投資於公共公司。一段時間後,他們可能會尋求賣出股份,並在其他地方重新配置資本。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 10%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私營企業持有該公司股份的10%。 單憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得查明是誰擁有那些私營企業。 有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過另一個私營公司持有公共公司股份的利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

We can see that public companies hold 8.6% of the Hesai Group shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們可以看到,公共公司持有禾賽集團發行股份的8.6%。很難確定,但這表明它們擁有交織在一起的業務利益。這可能是一種戰略性持股,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Hesai Group is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,禾賽集團在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警示信號,您應該知道……

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論