share_log

Institutional Investors in AppFolio, Inc. (NASDAQ:APPF) Lost 8.5% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in AppFolio, Inc. (NASDAQ:APPF) Lost 8.5% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

AppFolio公司的機構投資者上週損失了8.5%,但已經獲得了長期增長的好處
Simply Wall St ·  00:42

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in AppFolio implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在AppFolio中持有大量股份意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響
  • 前8大股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of AppFolio, Inc. (NASDAQ:APPF), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

爲了了解誰真正控制着AppFolio, Inc. (納斯達克:appfolio),重要的是理解這家企業的所有權結構。我們可以看到機構擁有該公司53%的股份。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下行風險)

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$683m last week. However, the 11% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

上週公司市值下跌了68300萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最大損失。然而,11%的一年回報可能有助於減輕他們的整體損失。然而,我們會假設他們將會密切關注未來的弱勢情況。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of AppFolio, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究appfolio每種所有者的情況,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGM:APPF Ownership Breakdown October 17th 2024
納斯達克股票交易所:APPF所有權拆分2024年10月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AppFolio?

機構持股告訴我們有關appfolio的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AppFolio. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at AppFolio's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你看到的,機構投資者在appfolio中擁有相當大比例的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區具有一定的可信度。但最好謹慎依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時會犯錯誤。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下以下appfolio的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGM:APPF Earnings and Revenue Growth October 17th 2024
納斯達克GM:appfolio盈利和營業收入增長2024年10月17日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. AppFolio is not owned by hedge funds. Maurice Duca is currently the largest shareholder, with 18% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.7% and 6.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能共同影響董事會決定。 AppFolio不是對沖基金所有。 目前Maurice Duca是最大的股東,持有已發行股份的18%。 與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.7%和6.4%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of AppFolio

appfolio內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of AppFolio, Inc.. Insiders own US$2.3b worth of shares in the US$7.4b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士擁有appfolio的相當比例。內部人士在這家價值74億美元的公司中擁有23億美元的股份。這是非常有意義的。大多數人會認爲,這顯示了與股東的良好契合度,特別是在這樣規模的公司。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此他們不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種擁有量可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that AppFolio is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我發現看看究竟是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。請注意,appfolio在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警示標誌,你應該知道……

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論