share_log

Individual Investors Who Hold 33% of Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:KIND) Gained 6.1%, Institutions Profited as Well

Individual Investors Who Hold 33% of Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:KIND) Gained 6.1%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有Nextdoor Holdings, Inc.(紐交所:KIND)33%股份的個人投資者獲利6.1%,機構也獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  10/17 22:07

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Nextdoor Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
  • 12% of Nextdoor Holdings is held by insiders
  • 個人投資者在Nextdoor Holdings擁有相當大的所有權,這表明他們共同對管理和業務策略有更大的發言權
  • 前10大股東持有51%的股份。
  • Nextdoor Holdings的12%股份由內部投資者持有

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:KIND), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 33% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制着Nextdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:KIND),重要的是要了解該企業的所有權結構。個人投資者持有33%的股份,在公司中擁有最多的股份。換句話說,該群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)。

Following a 6.1% increase in the stock price last week, individual investors profited the most, but institutions who own 32% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

上週股價上漲6.1%,個人投資者獲利最多,但持有32%股票的機構也從增長中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Nextdoor Holdings.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Nextdoor Holdings的什麼信息。

big
NYSE:KIND Ownership Breakdown October 17th 2024
紐交所:KIND股權拆分 2024年10月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nextdoor Holdings?

機構所有權能告訴我們關於Nextdoor Holdings的什麼

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Nextdoor Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Nextdoor Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Nextdoor Holdings確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當一部分股份。這表明在專業投資者之間具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某股的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此值得查看Nextdoor Holdings的以下營業收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:KIND Earnings and Revenue Growth October 17th 2024
紐交所:KIND盈利和營業收入增長2024年10月17日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Nextdoor Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is Benchmark, with ownership of 14%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.8% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.8% by the third-largest shareholder. Nirav Tolia, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

我們注意到對門控控股公司的對沖基金沒有實質性投資。該公司最大的股東是Benchmark,持有14%的股份。爲了解背景,第二大股東持有約8.8%的已發行股份,第三大股東持有6.8%的股份。第三大股東尼拉夫·託利亞(Nirav Tolia)也恰好擔任董事會主席職務。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步了解到,前10大股東持有通富微電大約51%的註冊資本,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,能夠在某種程度上平衡彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Nextdoor Holdings

Nextdoor Holdings內部人持股狀況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Nextdoor Holdings, Inc.. Insiders have a US$118m stake in this US$969m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部持有Nextdoor Holdings, Inc.的比例是合理的。內部人士在這家價值96900萬美元的公司中持有11800萬美元的股權。看到內部人士對業務如此投入是件好事。或許值得查看一下這些內部人士最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

雖然值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他更重要的因素。因此,您應該知道我們發現的上海廣旭科技的1個警告信號。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 23%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

擁有23%的私募股權投資公司正處於塑造以創造價值爲重點的企業戰略的位置。有些人可能會喜歡這個,因爲私募股權有時是對管理層負責的活躍投資者。但也有時,這些私募股權會出售股票,並使公司上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Nextdoor Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Nextdoor Holdings that you should be aware of.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解Nextdoor Holdings,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了一種對Nextdoor Holdings的警告,你應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論