share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM) With 71% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM) With 71% Ownership

機構投資者對紐交所農產品抵押貸款公司(NYSE:AGM)擁有71%股權投入了大量資金。
Simply Wall St ·  10/17 19:35

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Federal Agricultural Mortgage implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 18 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構持有農業聯邦抵押貸款股份的大部分意味着他們對公司的股價有重要影響
  • 共有18位投資者持有該公司超過50%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (NYSE:AGM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 71% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着聯邦農業抵押貸款公司(紐交所:AGM),重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司71%的所有權。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$2.0b in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 36% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週,公司市值達到20億美元后,機構投資者最終獲益最多。投資一年的回報率目前爲36%,而上週的獲利肯定更受歡迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Federal Agricultural Mortgage.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對聯邦農業抵押貸款有什麼可以告訴我們的。

big
NYSE:AGM Ownership Breakdown October 17th 2024
紐交所: AGm 2024年10月17日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Federal Agricultural Mortgage?

機構持股告訴我們有關聯邦農業抵押貸款的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Federal Agricultural Mortgage does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Federal Agricultural Mortgage's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到聯邦農業抵押貸款確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但最好警惕依賴所謂的機構投資者帶來的認可。他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在一種風險,即它們介入的交易可能太過熱門。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會爭相迅速拋售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以看到聯邦農業抵押貸款的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。

big
NYSE:AGM Earnings and Revenue Growth October 17th 2024
紐交所: 農產品營收增長 拉長到2024年10月17日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Federal Agricultural Mortgage. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.1% of shares outstanding. With 7.1% and 5.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, FMR LLC and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對聯邦農業抵押貸款沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。目前,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股東,持有7.1%的股份。分別持有已發行股份的7.1%和5.4%,FMR LLC和The Vanguard Group, Inc.分別是第二和第三大股東。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

進一步觀察股權數據,前18名股東共持有50%的所有權,這意味着沒有任何一名股東佔據多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Federal Agricultural Mortgage

聯邦農業抵押貸款的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$29m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東們可能會對發現內部人員擁有美國聯邦農業抵押貸款公司的股份感興趣。內部人員持有價值2900萬美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。大多數人會說這顯示了股東與董事會利益一致。儘管如此,值得一提的是要檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Federal Agricultural Mortgage. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有28%股權的廣大公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對美國聯邦農業抵押貸款公司具有一定的影響力。儘管擁有這一較大的股權,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Federal Agricultural Mortgage better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Federal Agricultural Mortgage (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是有價值的。但要更好地了解聯邦農業抵押貸款,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了聯邦農業抵押貸款的2個警示信號(其中1個非常重要!),在投資這裏之前您應該意識到這些。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論