share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Enphase Energy, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ENPH) Recent US$1.6b Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Enphase Energy, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ENPH) Recent US$1.6b Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

機構持有者可能會考慮採取 drastc 措施,因爲 Enphase Energy,Inc.(納斯達克:ENPH)最近的 16 億美元下跌加劇了長期損失。
Simply Wall St ·  03:14

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Enphase Energy's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構在該股票中持有大量股份,Enphase Energy的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 業務的51%由前15名股東持有。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Enphase Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:ENPH), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想了解誰真正控制Enphase Energy, Inc. (納斯達克:ENPH),那麼你就需要看一下它的股東名冊構成。機構持有86%的股份,是該公司中持股最多的實體。換句話說,該機構有望從對公司的投資中獲得最高收益(或承擔最高風險)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$1.6b. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 29% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Enphase Energy which might hurt individual investors.

因此,機構投資者在上週遭受了最大的損失,因爲市值下降了16億美元。毋庸置疑,最近的損失進一步增加了股東去年29%的損失,尤其是對於這類股東而言可能不太樂觀。通常被稱爲"市場動量者",機構在影響任何股票價格動態方面具有重要的影響力。因此,如果下跌持續下去,機構投資者可能受到壓力,不得不出售 enphase energy,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Enphase Energy, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究 enphase energy 的每一類股東,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGM:ENPH Ownership Breakdown October 16th 2024
納斯達克股市:ENPH 所有權拆分於2024年10月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Enphase Energy?

機構持股告訴我們關於 enphase energy 的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Enphase Energy already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Enphase Energy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

enphase energy 已經有機構在股東名冊中。實際上,他們在公司擁有一部分相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看 enphase energy 下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGM:ENPH Earnings and Revenue Growth October 16th 2024
納斯達克GM:enphase energy 營收和收入增長2024年10月16日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Enphase Energy. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 4.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Badrinarayanan Kothandaraman directly holds 1.2% of the total shares outstanding.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對於 enphase energy,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc. 是該公司最大的股東,持有已發行股份的12%。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的11%和4.6%。此外,該公司的CEO Badrinarayanan Kothandaraman 直接持有已發行股份的1.2%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

所有者們擁有Compass Diversified 33%的股份,其中主要由個人投資者組成,對Compass Diversified產生了一定的影響。雖然該所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益之下影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Enphase Energy

enphase energy 內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Enphase Energy, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$387m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告,內部人士確實擁有 enphase energy 股票。這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員共擁有價值38700萬美元的股票(以當前價格計算)。大多數人會認爲這顯示股東和董事會之間有良好的利益一致性。但還是值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在賣出股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

廣大公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的持股,因此不能被輕視。雖然這個群體不能決定掌控權,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Enphase Energy better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Enphase Energy is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

始終值得考慮公司股份持有的不同群體。但要更好地了解enphase energy,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,enphase energy在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該了解...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論