share_log

Heritage Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:HFWA) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 7.0% Over Last Week

Heritage Financial Corporation's (NASDAQ:HFWA) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 7.0% Over Last Week

heritage financial 公司(納斯達克:HFWA)高機構持股凸顯股票自身實力,股價繼續保持強勁,上漲7.0% 上週
Simply Wall St ·  10/16 20:05

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Heritage Financial implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構在heritage financial的大量持股意味着它們對公司股價有重大影響
  • 共有11名投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔有51%的所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

A look at the shareholders of Heritage Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:HFWA) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下heritage financial corporation(納斯達克:HFWA)的股東就能告訴我們哪個群體最爲強勢。公司中持有股份最多的群體,準確地說是約81%,是機構。換句話說,這個群體面對着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Last week's 7.0% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 42% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週的7.0%漲幅意味着機構投資者處於正面區間,即使公司展現出強勁的長期趨勢。 股東的一年回報率目前爲42%,上週的漲幅更是錦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Heritage Financial.

讓我們更仔細地看看股東的不同類型能告訴我們關於heritage financial的什麼。

big
NasdaqGS:HFWA Ownership Breakdown October 16th 2024
納斯達克:HFWA股權分佈2024年10月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Heritage Financial?

機構持股告訴我們heritage financial的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Heritage Financial does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Heritage Financial's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到heritage financial確實有機構投資者;並且他們持有公司股份的很大一部分。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經關注過這隻股票,而且他們喜歡它。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。 因此,值得查看下heritage financial的下面收益歷史。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:HFWA Earnings and Revenue Growth October 16th 2024
納斯達克GS:heritage financial股票的收益和營業收入增長於2024年10月16日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Heritage Financial is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.2% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重大影響力。heritage financial不是對沖基金擁有的。 BlackRock,股份公司目前是公司最大的股東,持有14%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有公司已發行股份中的7.2%和5.6%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的了解,我們發現前11名在該公司擁有51%的所有權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Heritage Financial

heritage financial的內部股權所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Heritage Financial Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$773m, and insiders have US$16m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說內部持有heritage financial公司的股份。其市值僅爲7730萬美元,內部人員名下擁有1600萬美元的股份。一些人可能會說這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但值得檢查的是這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有該公司17%的股份,因此不能被忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益之中影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Heritage Financial better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Heritage Financial .

始終值得考慮在公司持有股份的不同群體。但要更好地理解heritage financial,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應了解我們發現的heritage financial存在的2個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論