share_log

Chewy, Inc.'s (NYSE:CHWY) Market Cap Touched US$12b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 59% as Well as Institutions

Chewy, Inc.'s (NYSE:CHWY) Market Cap Touched US$12b Last Week, Benefiting Both Private Companies Who Own 59% as Well as Institutions

chewy, Inc.(紐交所:CHWY)的市值上週達到了120億美元,受益的不僅有持有59%股份的私人公司,還有機構
Simply Wall St ·  10/14 20:49

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Chewy by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Argos Holdings L.P with a 59% stake
  • Institutions own 27% of Chewy
  • 私營公司對Chewy的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多影響管理和治理決策的權力
  • 該公司最大的股東是Argos Holdings L.P,持有59%的股份
  • 機構擁有Chewy的27%

Every investor in Chewy, Inc. (NYSE:CHWY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 59% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Chewy, Inc. (紐交所: CHWY)的每位投資者都應該意識到最有力的股東團體。擁有公司最大數量股份的集團,準確地說約佔59%,是私營公司。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Private companies gained the most after market cap touched US$12b last week, while institutions who own 27% also benefitted.

私營公司在市值上週觸及120億美元后獲得了最大利益,而擁有27%股份的機構也受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Chewy.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關 Chewy 的什麼情況。

big
NYSE:CHWY Ownership Breakdown October 14th 2024
紐交所:CHWY 2024年10月14日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chewy?

機構持股告訴我們有關Chewy的什麼信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Chewy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Chewy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到 Chewy 確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的相當部分。這暗示着在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲一些時候機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像所有人都會一樣。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們在一項『擁擠交易』中的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險會更高。你可以在下面看到 Chewy 的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住這個故事絕不止這些。

big
NYSE:CHWY Earnings and Revenue Growth October 14th 2024
紐交所:Chewy2024年10月14日的盈利和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Chewy. The company's largest shareholder is Argos Holdings L.P, with ownership of 59%. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.6% and 2.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到對Chewy沒有意義的對沖基金投資。該公司最大的股東是Argos Holdings L.P,持股59%。這意味着他們對公司未來擁有控制權。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的4.6%和2.5%。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Chewy

Chewy內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Chewy, Inc.. Insiders own US$346m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告內部人確實持有Chewy, Inc.的股份。內部人持有價值3.46億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會對他們是在買入還是賣出感興趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Chewy. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有11%的股份,主要由個人投資者構成的普通大衆對Chewy具有一定影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以左右有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 59%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

公共公司目前持有北部灣港10.0%的股份。很難確定,但這表明它們具有相互交織的商業利益。這可能是一種戰略利益,因此值得關注股份所有權的變化情況。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Chewy has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。 以風險爲例 - Chewy的 1個警示標誌 我們認爲您應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論