share_log

First Foundation Inc.'s (NYSE:FFWM) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 7.5% Over Last Week

First Foundation Inc.'s (NYSE:FFWM) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 7.5% Over Last Week

First Foundation Inc.(紐交所:FFWM)的高機構持股彰顯實力,股票繼續表現出色,上漲7.5%,持續上週。
Simply Wall St ·  10/12 22:34

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, First Foundation's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 考慮到機構在股票中持有大量股份,First Foundation的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響
  • 共有12名投資者擁有公司的大部分股權,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

Every investor in First Foundation Inc. (NYSE:FFWM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 49% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

First Foundation Inc.(紐約證券交易所:FFWM)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。 機構持有49%的股份,在公司中擁有最多的股權。 換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$561m in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 27% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週,紐交所股票市值達到56100萬美元后,機構投資者獲益最多。目前投資回報率爲27%,而上週的收益應該更受歡迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about First Foundation.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於first foundation的什麼。

big
NYSE:FFWM Ownership Breakdown October 12th 2024
紐交所:FFWm 2024年10月12日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About First Foundation?

機構持股告訴我們關於first foundation的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that First Foundation does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at First Foundation's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到First Foundation確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的First Foundation盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:FFWM Earnings and Revenue Growth October 12th 2024
紐交所:FFWm 收益和營業收入增長2024年10月12日

It looks like hedge funds own 13% of First Foundation shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Strategic Value Bank Partners LLC, with ownership of 10.0%. FMR LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 7.5% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 5.8% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Scott Kavanaugh is the owner of 2.1% of the company's shares.

看起來對沖基金持有First Foundation股份的13%。這一點值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常積極的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內實現價值創造(和更高的股價)。該公司最大的股東是Strategic Value Bank Partners LLC,持有10.0%的股份。 FMR LLC 是第二大股東,擁有7.5%的普通股,BlackRock, Inc. 擁有公司股票的約5.8%。此外,CEO Scott Kavanaugh 擁有公司股份的2.1%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

辛蒙斯第一國家銀行內部所有權

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of First Foundation

First Foundation的內部股權所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in First Foundation Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$33m worth of stock in the US$561m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告內部人士確實擁有First Foundation股票。在他們自己的名字下,內部人士擁有價值3300萬美元的股票,在這家市值56100萬美元的公司中。有人會說,這顯示了股東與董事會之間利益的一致性。但值得檢查的是,這些內部人士是否一直在拋售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此他們不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種擁有量可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for First Foundation that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有更重要的因素。例如,我們發現了first foundation的一個警示信號,您在投資之前應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論