With 82% Institutional Ownership, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (NYSE:MKC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 82% Institutional Ownership, McCormick & Company, Incorporated (NYSE:MKC) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies McCormick's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構持有的股份比例非常高,這意味着 McCormick 的股價受到它們交易行爲的影響
- 前18位股東持有51%的股份。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
A look at the shareholders of McCormick & Company, Incorporated (NYSE:MKC) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看麥考密克(McCormick & Company, Incorporated)的股東,就可以告訴我們哪個群體最有實力。公司中持有最多股份的群體,準確來說是約 82%,是機構。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的潛在上行空間(或下行風險)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of McCormick, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究麥考密克的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About McCormick?
機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於麥考密克?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
McCormick already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see McCormick's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
麥考密克已經有機構出現在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。但最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。他們有時也會弄錯。當多家機構持有一支股票時,總是存在一種風險,即它們參與了一場「擁擠的交易」。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到麥考密克的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更豐富多彩的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. McCormick is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.2% and 6.2% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。麥考密克不是對沖基金持有。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc. 是最大的股東,持有12%的已發行股票。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約7.2%和6.2%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 18 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到擁有權的51%受到前18名股東的控制,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有絕對控股權益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of McCormick
麥考密克的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of McCormick & Company, Incorporated. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$101m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有者擁有麥肯錫公司不到1%的股份。 由於公司規模如此之大,我們不會指望內部持有者擁有大量股票。 他們共同擁有1.01億美元的股票。 在這種情況下,看一下這些內部持有者是在買入還是賣出會更有趣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in McCormick. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在麥肯錫擁有18%的股份。 儘管佔有比例相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,則這種所有權可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for McCormick that you should be aware of.
我覺得看公司的股東是非常有趣的。但要真正獲得見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經發現了麥考密克的2個警告信號,你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。