Does Frontline (NYSE:FRO) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Frontline (NYSE:FRO) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Frontline plc (NYSE:FRO) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
戴維·伊本說得很好:"波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本永久損失。" 當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過多可能導致滅亡。 與許多其他公司一樣,Frontline Plc (紐交所:FRO) 使用債務。 但這筆債務是否讓股東擔憂?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什麼時候負債才是一個問題?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
債務可以幫助企業,直到企業還清債務,或者通過新資本或自由現金流償還債務。企業資本主義的一個重要流程是「創造性毀滅」,這裏銀行家無情地清算失敗的企業。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,一家公司必須以便宜的股票價格稀釋股東,以控制債務。當然,債務的好處在於,它通常代表廉價的資本,特別是當它替換一家公司的稀釋股票並具備以高回報率再投資的能力時。當我們檢查債務水平時,首先考慮現金和債務水平。
What Is Frontline's Net Debt?
Frontline的淨債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2024 Frontline had US$3.86b of debt, an increase on US$2.30b, over one year. On the flip side, it has US$367.5m in cash leading to net debt of about US$3.49b.
您可以點擊下方的圖表查看歷史數據,但數據顯示截至2024年6月,Frontline的債務爲38.6億美元,比一年前的23億美元有所增加。 另一方面,它有3,6750萬美元的現金,導致淨債務約爲349億美元。
A Look At Frontline's Liabilities
Frontline的負債情況一覽
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Frontline had liabilities of US$621.8m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$3.40b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$367.5m and US$306.8m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$3.35b.
深入研究最新資產負債表數據,我們可以看到Frontline在接下來12個月內到期的負債爲62180萬美元,而到期日超過12個月的負債爲34億美元。另一方面,它擁有36750萬美元的現金和30680萬美元價值的應收款項,這意味着其負債超過現金和(短期)應收款項的總和達335億美元。
This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of US$5.39b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Frontline's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
相對於53.9億美元的市值,Frontline的這一赤字相當可觀,這表明股東應該密切關注Frontline的債務使用情況。這意味着如果公司需要緊急彌補資產負債表,股東的股份將被大量稀釋。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。
Frontline's debt is 3.7 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 3.2 times over. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Investors should also be troubled by the fact that Frontline saw its EBIT drop by 19% over the last twelve months. If things keep going like that, handling the debt will about as easy as bundling an angry house cat into its travel box. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Frontline can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Frontline的債務是其EBITDA的3.7倍,其EBIT覆蓋其利息支出的倍數爲3.2倍。綜合考慮,這意味着雖然我們不希望債務水平上升,但我們認爲Frontline可以處理其目前的槓桿。投資者可能還會因爲Frontline在過去十二個月中看到其EBIT下降了19%而感到擔憂。如果事情繼續下去,處理債務將幾乎如同將一隻憤怒的家貓塞進旅行箱一樣困難。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定Frontline是否能夠隨着時間加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想知道專業人士的觀點,您可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Frontline burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最後,雖然稅務人員可能很喜愛會計利潤,但放貸人只接受冰冷的現金。因此,我們明顯需要看一下這些EBIT是否會帶來對應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,Frontline消耗了大量現金。雖然這可能是爲了增長而進行的支出所致,但這確實使債務變得更加風險。
Our View
我們的觀點
To be frank both Frontline's EBIT growth rate and its track record of converting EBIT to free cash flow make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. And even its net debt to EBITDA fails to inspire much confidence. We're quite clear that we consider Frontline to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. For this reason we're pretty cautious about the stock, and we think shareholders should keep a close eye on its liquidity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Frontline (of which 2 are concerning!) you should know about.
坦率地說,Frontline的EBIt增長率以及其將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的歷史記錄使我們對其債務水平感到相當不安。即使其淨債務與EBITDA的比率也沒有給我們帶來太多信心。我們非常清楚地認爲Frontline實際上相當風險,這是由於其資產負債表健康狀況造成的。因此,我們對該股持謹慎態度,並認爲股東應密切關注其流動性。資產負債表顯然是你在分析債務時應關注的焦點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。這些風險可能很難察覺。每家公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現了Frontline的3個警示信號(其中有2個令人擔憂!)你應該知道。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。