share_log

Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 78% of the Company

Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 78% of the Company

安進公司(納斯達克:AMGN)在很大程度上由持有公司78%股份的機構股東所控制
Simply Wall St ·  10/11 00:14

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Amgen's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構持有的比例極高,意味着安進的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 前25大股東擁有該公司的49%。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 78% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着安進公司(納斯達克:AMGN),那麼您需要查看其股東名單的構成。持有最大股份的是機構,佔比爲78%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,則該機構將獲益最多(或者在出現下行時損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Amgen.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了安進不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:AMGN Ownership Breakdown October 10th 2024
納斯達克:AMGN所有權拆分2024年10月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amgen?

機構持股給我們關於安進的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Amgen. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Amgen, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在安進擁有相當大的股份。 這表明在專業投資者中享有一定的信譽。 但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像所有人都會做的一樣。 如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。 因此,值得檢查安進的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。 當然,還要記住也有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:AMGN Earnings and Revenue Growth October 10th 2024
納斯達克指數安進營收和利潤增長2024年10月10日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Amgen. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.7%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。我們注意到對安進並沒有投入有意義的投資的對沖基金。該公司最大的股東是耐心集團,擁有9.7%的股權。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.6%的流通股份,第三大股東持有5.4%的股權。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Amgen

安進的內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Amgen Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$286m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士在自己的名義下擁有Amgen公司不到1%的股份。規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部人士擁有大量的股票。總體而言,他們擁有價值2億8600萬美元的股票。可以說,最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆-包括散戶投資者-擁有該公司的 21% 的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。儘管該群體不能決定公司的方向,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Amgen better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Amgen (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得思考的。但要更好地了解安進,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,需要考慮投資風險這個永遠存在的威脅。我們已經確認了安進存在4個警示信號(至少有1個有點令人不快),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論