share_log

Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE:PEG) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE:PEG) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

公務集團(紐交所:PEG)資產負債表略顯緊張
Simply Wall St ·  10/09 00:56

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (NYSE:PEG) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

傳奇基金經理李錄(得到查理·芒格支持)曾經說過:'最大的投資風險不在於價格波動,而在於你是否會遭受到資本永久性損失。'因此,看起來聰明人知道,債務(通常涉及破產)在評估公司風險時是一個非常重要的因素。我們注意到,紐交所:公務集團有債務負擔。但這筆債務會讓股東擔憂嗎?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業無法償還債務,那麼它存在於債權人的控制之下。 最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能一無所有。然而,更經常發生的(但仍然代價高昂)情況是,公司必須以低於市價的價格發行股票,永久性地稀釋股東的股權,以維持其資產負債表。當然,很多公司使用債務來支持增長,而沒有任何負面影響。在考慮企業使用了多少債務時,首先要做的是查看其現金和債務的總體情況。

How Much Debt Does Public Service Enterprise Group Carry?

公務集團股份有限公司有多少債務負擔?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Public Service Enterprise Group had debt of US$21.4b, up from US$19.7b in one year. And it doesn't have much cash, so its net debt is about the same.

下圖顯示2024年6月公務集團的債務爲214億美元,比一年前的197億美元有所增加。而該公司現金不多,因此淨債務大致相同。

big
NYSE:PEG Debt to Equity History October 8th 2024
紐交所:公務集團債權股權歷史2024年10月8日

A Look At Public Service Enterprise Group's Liabilities

公務集團負債情況一覽

According to the last reported balance sheet, Public Service Enterprise Group had liabilities of US$5.53b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$31.0b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$113.0m as well as receivables valued at US$1.65b due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$34.8b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根據最近一份報告的資產負債表顯示,公務集團有價值55.3億美元的負債需要在12個月內償還,以及價值310億美元的負債需在12個月後償還。 抵消這些債務的是,它有價值11300萬美元的現金,以及價值16.5億美元的應收賬款需要在12個月內償還。 因此,其負債總計高達348億美元,比其現金和短期應收賬款總和還要多。

This is a mountain of leverage even relative to its gargantuan market capitalization of US$45.8b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

相比於其458億美元的龐大市值,這是一座負債的巨大山峯。 這表明,如果公司需要緊急支撐其資產負債表,股東們將面臨嚴重稀釋。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。

With a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 5.9, it's fair to say Public Service Enterprise Group does have a significant amount of debt. But the good news is that it boasts fairly comforting interest cover of 3.3 times, suggesting it can responsibly service its obligations. Even worse, Public Service Enterprise Group saw its EBIT tank 42% over the last 12 months. If earnings keep going like that over the long term, it has a snowball's chance in hell of paying off that debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Public Service Enterprise Group can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

淨債務與EBITDA比率爲5.9,公務集團確實擁有大量債務。 但好消息是,其利息覆蓋率爲3.3倍,表明其可以負責地償還債務。 更糟糕的是,公務集團在過去12個月內看到其EBIT下降了42%。 如果收入長期保持這種趨勢,那麼償還債務的機會微乎其微。 毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解到大部分債務情況。 但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定公務集團是否能夠隨着時間加強其資產負債表。 因此,如果您專注於未來,您可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, Public Service Enterprise Group saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤無法解決。 因此,邏輯上來看,應該查看實際自由現金流所匹配的EBIT比例。 在過去三年裏,公務集團的負面自由現金流相當可觀。 雖然投資者無疑希望這種情況會很快逆轉,但這顯然意味着其債務使用更加冒險。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, Public Service Enterprise Group's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow left us tentative about the stock, and its EBIT growth rate was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. And furthermore, its interest cover also fails to instill confidence. We should also note that Integrated Utilities industry companies like Public Service Enterprise Group commonly do use debt without problems. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think Public Service Enterprise Group has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example Public Service Enterprise Group has 4 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about.

一開始,公務集團將EBIT轉爲自由現金流令我們對該股持保留態度,其EBIT增長率也沒有比年度最繁忙夜晚的一個空餐館更有吸引力。此外,其利息覆蓋率也未能帶來信心。我們還應注意,像公務集團這樣的綜合公用事業行業公司通常會在沒有問題的情況下使用債務。在考慮討論過的數據點之後,我們認爲公務集團的債務過多。這種風險對某些人來說是可以接受的,但對我們來說肯定不合適。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。例如,公務集團有4個警示信號(其中一個有點令人關注),我們認爲您應該知道。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論