share_log

CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 75% of the Company

CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 75% of the Company

CSX公司(納斯達克:CSX)受到持有公司75%股份的機構投資者青睞
Simply Wall St ·  10/07 19:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies CSX's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構擁有的股份比例高意味着CSX的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前25大股東擁有該公司的49%。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

A look at the shareholders of CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 75% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下CSX Corporation (納斯達克:CSX) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體更有權力。而持有最大股份的群體是擁有75%所有權的機構。換句話說,該群體在他們對公司的投資中最有可能獲得最多利潤(或蒙受最大損失)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CSX, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解CSX每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:CSX Ownership Breakdown October 7th 2024
NasdaqGS:CSX 所有權拆分 2024年10月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CSX?

機構所有權告訴我們關於CSX的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that CSX does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CSX, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到CSX確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的股票的相當大一部分。這可能表明公司在投資社區具有一定的可信度。然而,最好警惕依賴於被機構投資者所證實的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出某隻股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查CSX的過去盈利軌跡(以下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:CSX Earnings and Revenue Growth October 7th 2024
納斯達克GS:CSX 業績和營收增長 2024年10月7日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in CSX. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.6% and 4.2% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過已發行股票的一半,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對沖基金在CSX上沒有太多股份。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc. 是最大的股東,持有9.0%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.6%和4.2%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of CSX

CSX內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that CSX Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$104m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明CSX公司內部持有公司股份不到1%。作爲一家非常大的公司,看到內部持有公司大部分股份將會令人驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,我們可以看到董事會成員共持有價值1.04億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。可以說最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司24%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能必然掌控局面,但它肯定會對公司經營方式產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CSX better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with CSX , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

始終值得考慮公司的股東群體。 但要更好地了解CSX,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 比如,要考慮投資風險這個長時間存在的威脅。 我們已經發現了CSX的1個警告信號,了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論