share_log

Investors in Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) Have Seen Respectable Returns of 57% Over the Past Year

Investors in Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) Have Seen Respectable Returns of 57% Over the Past Year

美國銀行(紐交所:BAC)的投資者在過去一年中看到了可觀的57%回報率
Simply Wall St ·  10/07 18:04

Passive investing in index funds can generate returns that roughly match the overall market. But if you pick the right individual stocks, you could make more than that. For example, the Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC) share price is up 52% in the last 1 year, clearly besting the market return of around 32% (not including dividends). That's a solid performance by our standards! In contrast, the longer term returns are negative, since the share price is 8.4% lower than it was three years ago.

指數基金的被動投資可以獲得與整體市場大致匹配的回報。但如果您選擇正確的個別股票,可能會獲得更多。例如,美國銀行股份(NYSE:BAC)的股價在過去1年上漲了52%,明顯優於市場回報約32%(不包括股息)。按照我們的標準,這是一個良好的表現!相比之下,長期回報爲負,因爲股價比三年前低8.4%。

So let's investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.

那麼,讓我們調查一下並查看公司的長期表現是否符合基本業務的進展。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS).

在他的《格雷厄姆和道德斯維爾的超級投資者》一文中,禾倫·巴菲特描述了股價並不總是合理反映企業價值的方法。檢驗市場情緒如何隨時間變化的一種方法是觀察公司股價和每股收益(EPS)之間的互動關係。

Over the last twelve months, Bank of America actually shrank its EPS by 18%.

在過去的十二個月裏,美國銀行實際上把其每股收益減少了18%。

Given the share price gain, we doubt the market is measuring progress with EPS. Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics.

考慮到股價的上漲,我們懷疑市場不是根據每股收益來衡量公司的進展。由於每股收益的變化似乎與股價的變化不相關,因此值得查看其他指標。

Revenue was pretty stable on last year, so deeper research might be needed to explain the share price rise.

去年的收入相當穩定,因此可能需要進行更深入的研究才能解釋股價上漲。

The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

下圖顯示了收益和營收隨時間變化的情況(如果你點擊圖像,可以看到更多細節):

big
NYSE:BAC Earnings and Revenue Growth October 7th 2024
紐交所:美國銀行2024年10月7日的收入和營業收入增長

We like that insiders have been buying shares in the last twelve months. Even so, future earnings will be far more important to whether current shareholders make money. So we recommend checking out this free report showing consensus forecasts

我們喜歡看到內部人在過去12個月內購買了股票。即便如此,未來股息的收益更爲重要,這決定了當前股東能否獲利。因此,我們建議查看這份免費報告,了解市場預期。

What About Dividends?

那麼分紅怎麼樣呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Bank of America the TSR over the last 1 year was 57%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

考慮到股票的總股東回報率以及股價回報率對於任何給定的股票都是很重要。 股價回報率僅反映了股價的變化,而TSR包括分紅的價值(假設已經再投資)以及任何折扣的融資或剝離的收益。 因此,對於支付豐厚股息的公司,TSR通常要比股價回報率高得多。 我們注意到,對於美國銀行,在過去的1年裏,TSR爲57%,這比上述的股價回報率要好。 公司支付的分紅因此提高了總股東回報。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

It's good to see that Bank of America has rewarded shareholders with a total shareholder return of 57% in the last twelve months. That's including the dividend. Since the one-year TSR is better than the five-year TSR (the latter coming in at 9% per year), it would seem that the stock's performance has improved in recent times. Someone with an optimistic perspective could view the recent improvement in TSR as indicating that the business itself is getting better with time. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks, for example - Bank of America has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

很高興看到美國銀行在過去十二個月裏以57%的總股東回報率回報股東。包括分紅在內。由於一年的TSR優於五年的TSR(後者爲每年9%),似乎股票的表現在最近有所改善。擁有樂觀視角的人可能認爲TSR的最近改善表明業務本身隨着時間的推移而變得更好。我覺得長期以來觀察股價作爲業務表現的替代品非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,承擔風險 - 我們認爲你應該注意美國銀行有1個警告信號。

Bank of America is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of small cap companies at attractive valuations which insiders have been buying.

美國銀行並不是內部人員在購買的唯一股票。因此,看看這份免費小盤公司名單,這些公司具有有吸引力的估值,內部人員一直在購買。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論