share_log

Voyager Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:VYGR) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 5.0% Loss Over the Past Year

Voyager Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:VYGR) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 5.0% Loss Over the Past Year

Voyager Therapeutics, Inc. (納斯達克:VYGR) 機構持有者可能會對最近一年5.0%的損失後獲得的收益感到滿意
Simply Wall St ·  10/06 22:44

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Voyager Therapeutics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構擁有的股份比例很高,意味着voyager therapeutics的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 總共有6個投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,佔有52%的所有權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Voyager Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:VYGR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 53% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制着voyager therapeutics, inc. (納斯達克:VYGR),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。機構持有53%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得(或損失)最多。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 20% increase in the share price after a year of 5.0% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價上漲20%,這是在一年虧損5.0%後,回報可能開始向更高趨勢發展的跡象。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Voyager Therapeutics.

讓我們更仔細地觀察,看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於voyager therapeutics的什麼信息。

big
NasdaqGS:VYGR Ownership Breakdown October 6th 2024
納斯達克:VYGR所有權拆分2024年10月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Voyager Therapeutics?

機構所有權告訴我們有關voyager therapeutics的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Voyager Therapeutics. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Voyager Therapeutics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在voyager therapeutics擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,他們對其喜歡。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總是有可能存在'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有成長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以看到voyager therapeutics的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多的。

big
NasdaqGS:VYGR Earnings and Revenue Growth October 6th 2024
納斯達克GS:voyager therapeutics 2024年10月6日營收和收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 17% of Voyager Therapeutics. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 9.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半發行的股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們的數據顯示,對於voyager therapeutics,對沖基金擁有17%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能會非常活躍和激進。許多對沖基金尋找將推高股價的中期催化劑。目前,Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.是最大的股東,持有流通股的16%。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的10%和9.5%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Voyager Therapeutics

voyager therapeutics的內部股權所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Voyager Therapeutics, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$4.2m worth of stock in the US$384m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

根據我們最新的數據顯示,內部持有者擁有Voyager Therapeutics公司的一些股份。在他們自己的名字下,內部持有者擁有美國3840萬公司中價值420萬美元的股票。有人會說,這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但值得檢查的是,這些內部持有者是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Voyager Therapeutics. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆擁有Voyager Therapeutics 14%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成,對Voyager Therapeutics有一定程度的影響。儘管這一所有權比較大,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 16% of Voyager Therapeutics. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

我們發現,公共公司擁有Voyager Therapeutics的16%股份。我們無法確定,但這很可能是一種戰略性的股份。這些企業可能是相似的,或者互相合作。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Voyager Therapeutics (of which 1 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同團體非常值得,但有其他更重要的因素。比如風險。每家公司都存在風險,我們已經發現了Voyager Therapeutics的3個警示信號(其中1個不容忽視!)你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論