share_log

RTX Corporation's (NYSE:RTX) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 3.8% Over Last Week

RTX Corporation's (NYSE:RTX) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 3.8% Over Last Week

RTX 公司(紐交所: RTX)高機構持股自證其有,股價持續走高,上漲3.8% 上週。
Simply Wall St ·  10/06 20:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, RTX's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 考慮到機構在股票中所持有的大部分股權,RTX的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
  • 前13大股東持有該業務的51%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of RTX Corporation (NYSE:RTX) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一下RTX公司(紐交所:RTX)的股東,就能了解哪個群體更具影響力。持有最大股份的群體是擁有83%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲得最大利益(或者如果市場走低,則會承擔最大風險)。

Last week's 3.8% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 84% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週3.8%的增長意味着機構投資者處於正面的一端,即使公司展現出強勁的長期趨勢。 股東的一年回報率目前爲84%,上週的增長更是錦上添花。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about RTX.

讓我們仔細看一下,看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關RTX的信息。

big
NYSE:RTX Ownership Breakdown October 6th 2024
紐交所:RTX 所有權拆分 2024年10月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RTX?

機構持有量對RTX有何影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that RTX does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RTX's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到RTX確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票並且喜歡它。 但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能錯了。 當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在着它們進行'湧入式交易'的風險。 當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。 在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。 您可以在下面看到RTX的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更復雜的。

big
NYSE:RTX Earnings and Revenue Growth October 6th 2024
紐交所:RTX收益和營業收入增長2024年10月6日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in RTX. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company with 12% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 8.7%.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能能夠強烈影響董事會的決定。我們注意到對沖基金對RTX沒有明顯的投資。通過我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是Capital Research and Management Company擁有12%的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是The Vanguard Group,Inc.和State Street Global Advisors,Inc.,他們各自持有相等比例的股份爲8.7%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據的進一步研究表明,前13大股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of RTX

RTX的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of RTX Corporation in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$154m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據顯示,在RTX公司中,內部持有人以自己的名義持有不到1%的股份。 這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部持有公司的比例很大是令人驚訝的。 儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共持有價值15400萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 看到至少有一些內部所有權總是件好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in RTX. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常是個體投資者,在RTX持有16%的股份。 儘管這一群體不能直接決定事情,但他們確實可以對公司的經營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for RTX (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看一家公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經發現了有關RTX的4個警示跡象(其中一個有點令人擔憂!),在投資之前您應該注意這些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論