share_log

Greif (NYSE:GEF) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

Greif (NYSE:GEF) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

格瑞夫(紐交所:GEF)在債務使用方面承擔了一些風險
Simply Wall St ·  10/04 22:57

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Greif, Inc. (NYSE:GEF) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過,「波動性與風險並非同義詞」。因此,當您考慮股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。重要的是,格瑞夫公司(紐交所: GEF)確實有債務。但這種債務會讓股東擔憂嗎?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務在業務還清前都能爲其提供支持,直到業務出現困境,通過新資本或自由現金流來還清。 最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能什麼也得不到。 然而,更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是它必須以低價籌集新股權資本,從而永久稀釋股東的權益。 相反,如果替代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本投資以高回報率實現增長的業務的極好工具。 考慮業務使用多少債務時,首先要做的是將其現金和債務放在一起查看。

What Is Greif's Debt?

格瑞夫的債務是什麼?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at July 2024 Greif had debt of US$2.91b, up from US$2.17b in one year. However, it also had US$194.2m in cash, and so its net debt is US$2.72b.

下面的圖片顯示,截至2024年7月,格瑞夫的債務爲29.1億美元,比一年前的21.7億美元增加。然而,它也有1.942億美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲27.2億美元。

big
NYSE:GEF Debt to Equity History October 4th 2024
紐交所: GEF 債務股本比歷史數據 2024年10月4日

A Look At Greif's Liabilities

格瑞夫負債情況一覽

According to the last reported balance sheet, Greif had liabilities of US$1.01b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$3.60b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$194.2m in cash and US$785.7m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$3.63b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根據最近報告的資產負債表顯示,格瑞夫有101億美元的負債需要在12個月內償還,而360億美元的負債需要在12個月後償還。抵消這些,其在12個月內有1億9420萬美元的現金和7億8570萬美元的應收賬款。因此,其負債總計比其現金和短期應收賬款合計高出363億美元。

Given this deficit is actually higher than the company's market capitalization of US$3.04b, we think shareholders really should watch Greif's debt levels, like a parent watching their child ride a bike for the first time. Hypothetically, extremely heavy dilution would be required if the company were forced to pay down its liabilities by raising capital at the current share price.

考慮到這一赤字實際上高於公司304億美元的市值,我們認爲股東們確實應該像父母看着孩子第一次騎自行車一樣關注格瑞夫的債務水平。假設,如果公司被迫以當前股價增資償還債務,就需要進行極度重大的股權稀釋。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

Service Corporation International的債務是其EBITDA的3.5倍,而其EBIT可覆蓋其利息開支的3.7倍。綜合考慮,雖然我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲它可以應對當前的槓桿。好消息是,Service Corporation International在過去12個月中將其EBIT提高了2.9%,從而逐漸降低了其相對於收益的債務水平。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中獲得了有關債務的大部分內容。但是,相對於資產負債表,更重要的是未來收益,這將決定Service Corporation International維持健康資產負債表的能力。如果您關注未來,您可以查看此免費報告,其中有分析師的利潤預測。

Greif has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.8 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 3.8 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Even worse, Greif saw its EBIT tank 29% over the last 12 months. If earnings keep going like that over the long term, it has a snowball's chance in hell of paying off that debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Greif can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

格瑞夫的債務與EBITDA比率爲3.8,其EBIT覆蓋了其利息費用的3.8倍。綜合考慮,這意味着雖然我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲公司可以應對其目前的槓桿。更糟糕的是,格瑞夫過去12個月的EBIT下降了29%。如果收益長期保持這種走勢,那就幾乎沒有希望償還債務。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是開始的明顯地方。但最終企業未來的盈利能力將決定格瑞夫是否能夠隨着時間加強資產負債表。因此,如果您想知道專業人士的看法,您可能會覺得這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Greif produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 57% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不能應對。因此,邏輯上的步驟是查看那些與實際自由現金流匹配的EBIT的比例。在過去三年裏,格瑞夫產生了堅實的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的57%,基本符合我們的預期。這筆現鈔意味着公司可以在需要時減少其債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

We'd go so far as to say Greif's EBIT growth rate was disappointing. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. Overall, it seems to us that Greif's balance sheet is really quite a risk to the business. For this reason we're pretty cautious about the stock, and we think shareholders should keep a close eye on its liquidity. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Greif (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我們甚至可以說格瑞夫的EBIt增長速度令人失望。但至少它在將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流方面相當不錯;這是令人鼓舞的。總的來說,我們認爲格瑞夫的資產負債表對業務確實存在相當大的風險。因此,我們對這支股票相當謹慎,並認爲股東們應該密切關注其流動性。毫無疑問,我們大部分關於債務的知識都來源於資產負債表。但最終,每家公司都可能存在在資產負債表之外的風險。例如,我們已經發現了2個格瑞夫的警示跡象(其中1個有點不愉快!)在投資之前,您應該意識到這些。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論