share_log

With 83% Ownership, BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 83% Ownership, BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

擁有83%股份的黑石集團(NYSE:BLK)享有強大的機構支持
Simply Wall St ·  10/03 22:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies BlackRock's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構持股比例顯著高意味着貝萊德的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 總共有16家投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔50%的所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

A look at the shareholders of BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下貝萊德股份有限公司(紐交所:BLK)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個團體最有權勢。以83%的股權,機構擁有該公司中的最大股份。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of BlackRock, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解BlackRock的每種股東類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:BLK Ownership Breakdown October 3rd 2024
紐交所:BLk所有權拆分2024年10月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BlackRock?

機構所有權告訴我們有關貝萊德的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

BlackRock already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see BlackRock's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

BlackRock已經有機構持有股份。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的信譽。 但是,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。 當多家機構持有某股時,總會存在一種「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下方看到BlackRock的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更復雜的。

big
NYSE:BLK Earnings and Revenue Growth October 3rd 2024
紐交所:貝萊德收入和營業收入增長於2024年10月3日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in BlackRock. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.9% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.2% and 5.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應注意,機構實際擁有公司超過一半,因此他們可以集體行使重要權力。我們注意到對沖基金在貝萊德沒有具有重大投資。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有8.9%的流通股。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的6.2%和5.4%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們的所有權數字顯示,前16名股東的所有權總計佔50%,這意味着沒有單一股東佔有多數。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of BlackRock

貝萊德的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of BlackRock, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$1.2b of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司的內部人員以自己的名義擁有不到1%的股份。 由於公司規模如此之大,我們不會指望內部人員擁有大量股票。 他們總共擁有12億美元的股票。 在這種情況下,看看那些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出股票可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in BlackRock. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在貝萊德持有11%的股份。 儘管這個群體不一定能左右公司的決策,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實質影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論