A Great Week That Adds to Valero Energy Corporation's (NYSE:VLO) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 84% Must Be Happy
A Great Week That Adds to Valero Energy Corporation's (NYSE:VLO) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 84% Must Be Happy
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Valero Energy implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 19 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構在瓦萊羅能源的大量持股意味着他們對該公司的股價有重要影響
- 前19大股東持有該公司50%的股份。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
A look at the shareholders of Valero Energy Corporation (NYSE:VLO) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 84% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一下瓦萊羅能源公司(NYSE:VLO)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。擁有該公司最多股份的群體,準確地說約佔公司股份的84%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$1.5b in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 6.0%.
上週該公司市值增加了15億美元,這對機構投資者來說情況正在好轉。上週的收益將進一步提升股東的一年回報率,目前爲6.0%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Valero Energy, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解瓦萊羅能源的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Valero Energy?
機構持股告訴我們有關瓦萊羅能源的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Valero Energy. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Valero Energy's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在瓦萊羅能源中擁有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變他們對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看瓦萊羅能源下面的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Valero Energy is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.7% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 7.1% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。瓦萊羅能源並不屬於對沖基金。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有已發行股份的9.7%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.4%和7.1%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步的挖掘,我們發現前19名股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司具有重大控制力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。
Insider Ownership Of Valero Energy
瓦萊羅能源的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Valero Energy Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$220m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
根據我們的數據,內部人員在瓦萊羅能源公司僅以自己的名義擁有不足1%的股份。由於規模如此之大,我們不會期望內部人員擁有大量的股票。集體擁有2.2億美元的股票。看到至少有一些內部人員持股始終是件好事,但也許值得查看這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Valero Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,在瓦萊羅能源擁有16%的股份。儘管這一所有權規模相當可觀,但可能不足以在決策與其他大股東不相符的情況下改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Valero Energy is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is potentially serious...
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,瓦萊羅能源在我們的投資分析中顯示出2個警示信號,其中1個可能很嚴重...
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。