Both Private Companies Who Control a Good Portion of Patria Investments Limited (NASDAQ:PAX) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 3.2% Decrease
Both Private Companies Who Control a Good Portion of Patria Investments Limited (NASDAQ:PAX) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 3.2% Decrease
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Patria Investments by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 54% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Patria Holdings Limited)
- Institutions own 32% of Patria Investments
- 私人公司對Patria Investments的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多的權力來影響管理和治理相關決策
- 54%的公司股份由單一股東(Patria Holdings Limited)持有
- 機構持有Patria Investments 32%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Patria Investments Limited (NASDAQ:PAX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着Patria Investments Limited(NASDAQ:PAX),重要的是要了解企業的所有權結構。公司中持有最多股份的集團,準確來說約爲54%,是私人公司。換句話說,這個集團面臨着最大的增長潛力(或下行風險)。
While institutions, who own 32% shares weren't spared from last week's US$57m market cap drop, private companies as a group suffered the maximum losses
即使擁有32%股份的機構上週也無法倖免於美元5,700萬的市值下跌,私人公司作爲一個整體遭受了最大的損失
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Patria Investments, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入分析每種Patria Investments所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Patria Investments?
機構持股告訴我們關於Patria Investments的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Patria Investments. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Patria Investments' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Patria Investments中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多家機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,那麼股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的Patria Investments收入歷史數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Patria Investments. Our data shows that Patria Holdings Limited is the largest shareholder with 54% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.6% by the third-largest shareholder.
我們注意到,對於Patria Investments,對沖基金並沒有很有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,Patria Holdings Limited是最大的股東,持有54%的流通股份。這基本上意味着他們在未來公司的運行中具有廣泛的影響力,甚至可以說是直接控制權。以第二大股東持有約8.5%的流通股份爲背景,第三大股東持有3.6%的股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Patria Investments
Patria Investments的內部股權所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Patria Investments Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$48m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以看到,內部人員擁有Patria Investments Limited的股份。內部人員持有價值4800萬美元的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。看到內部人員進行這種投資是件好事。您可以在這裏查看內部人員是否最近一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司12%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略它們。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但是肯定會對公司的運營產生影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 54%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私人公司擁有發行股份的54%。值得進一步深入研究。如果關聯方,如內部人士,在其中一傢俬人公司中擁有利益,這應在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能還對該公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Patria Investments better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Patria Investments you should be aware of.
考慮到在公司中擁有股份的不同群體總是值得思考的。但要更好地了解Patria投資,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 舉例來說:我們已經發現了Patria投資的3個警示標誌,您應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。