share_log

Does M/I Homes (NYSE:MHO) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Does M/I Homes (NYSE:MHO) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

mi 家居(紐交所:MHO)是否擁有健康的資產負債表?
Simply Wall St ·  10/02 18:04

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, M/I Homes, Inc. (NYSE:MHO) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說:"波動性與風險遠非同義詞。" 因此,明智的投資者知道,債務(通常涉及破產)是衡量一家公司風險程度的重要因素。值得注意的是,mi 家居公司(NYSE:MHO)確實有債務。但這筆債務是否會讓股東感到擔憂?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果一家企業無法償還債權人,那麼它存在的就是在債權人的掌控下。資本主義的重要組成部分是"創造性毀滅"的過程,即失敗的企業被銀行家無情清算。儘管這種情況並不常見,我們經常看到負債的公司因貸款人強迫其以低價募集資本而永久性稀釋股東權益。然而,債務可以取代稀釋,成爲需要資金以高回報率投資增長的企業的極好工具。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用時,首先要查看現金和債務。

How Much Debt Does M/I Homes Carry?

mi家居負債情況如何?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 M/I Homes had debt of US$917.2m, up from US$879.5m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$838.7m, its net debt is less, at about US$78.4m.

下面的圖片顯示,在2024年6月,mi 家居的債務爲9172萬美元,比一年前的8795萬美元有所增加。然而,由於其現金儲備爲8387萬美元,其淨債務更少,約爲784萬美元。

big
NYSE:MHO Debt to Equity History October 2nd 2024
NYSE:MHO 債務與股本歷史數據 2024年10月2日

A Look At M/I Homes' Liabilities

mi 家居負債情況一覽

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that M/I Homes had liabilities of US$536.6m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.06b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$838.7m and US$66.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$693.8m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,M/I Homes擁有到期不超過一年的額外責任US$53660萬,以及遠期到期的US$10.6億。另一方面,它擁有US$83870萬的現金和US$6640萬的應收款項。因此,其負債總額爲US$69380萬,超過了其現金和短期應收款項的總和。

Since publicly traded M/I Homes shares are worth a total of US$4.70b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

由於公開交易的mi 家居股票總值爲US$47億,看來這種水平的負債不太可能構成重大威脅。儘管如此,明顯的是,我們應該繼續監控其資產負債表,以防惡化。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。

M/I Homes has net debt of just 0.12 times EBITDA, suggesting it could ramp leverage without breaking a sweat. And remarkably, despite having net debt, it actually received more in interest over the last twelve months than it had to pay. So there's no doubt this company can take on debt while staying cool as a cucumber. Fortunately, M/I Homes grew its EBIT by 6.8% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine M/I Homes's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

M/I Homes的淨債務僅爲EBITDA的0.12倍,表明它可以輕鬆增加槓桿。值得注意的是,儘管有淨債務,但在過去十二個月中,它實際上獲得的利息比需要支付的還要多。因此,毫無疑問,這家公司可以負債而保持鎮定。幸運的是,mi 家居在過去一年中將其EBIt增長了6.8%,使得負債負擔看起來更容易應對。我們毫無疑問從資產負債表中對債務有了更多了解。但最重要的是,未來收入將決定M/I Homes維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您想知道專業人士的看法,您可能會發現分析師利潤預測的這份免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, M/I Homes recorded free cash flow of 37% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

最後,業務需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不足夠。因此,我們始終檢查其EBIt中有多少被轉化爲自由現金流。回顧最近三年,mi 家居的自由現金流佔其EBIt的37%,這比我們預期的要弱。這種較差的現金轉化使得難以處理債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, M/I Homes's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow. All these things considered, it appears that M/I Homes can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - M/I Homes has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

mi 家居令人歡欣的利息覆蓋率表明其在債務上具有優勢。但更令人擔憂的是,我們對其將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的情況有些擔心。考慮到所有這些因素,看來mi 家居可以輕鬆地處理其當前的債務水平。積極的一面是,這種槓桿可以提高股東回報,但潛在的風險是更大的損失風險,因此值得密切關注資產負債表。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中最多了解債務。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表內——遠非如此。例如,mi 家居有1個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論