Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NTLA) Recent US$92m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NTLA) Recent US$92m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Intellia Therapeutics' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 考慮到機構在股票中所佔的大部分股權,intellia therapeutics的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
- 前10大股東持有51%的股份。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
Every investor in Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:NTLA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
納斯達克上的Intellia Therapeutics股票的每位投資者都應該意識到最具影響力的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司87%的所有權。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者如果出現下跌)該群體將獲益最多(或者損失最大)。
And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 4.2% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 30% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Intellia Therapeutics which might hurt individual investors.
公司股價上週下跌4.2%,機構投資者遭受了最大的損失。 這組投資者可能特別關注當前的損失,這爲股東的一年損失增加了30%。 機構通常被稱爲"市場操縱者",在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有重要的影響力。 因此,如果下跌持續下去,機構投資者可能會面臨賣出Intellia Therapeutics的壓力,這可能會傷害個人投資者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Intellia Therapeutics.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注Intellia Therapeutics的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Intellia Therapeutics?
機構持有情況能告訴我們什麼有關Intellia Therapeutics的信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Intellia Therapeutics already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Intellia Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Intellia Therapeutics的股東名單上已經有了機構。 事實上,他們在公司擁有一定比例的股份。 這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。 但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。 如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售股票,經常會看到股價大幅下跌。 因此,值得查看Intellia Therapeutics的過去收益軌跡(如下)。 當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Intellia Therapeutics. The company's largest shareholder is ARK Investment Management LLC, with ownership of 11%. With 9.4% and 9.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO John Leonard directly holds 0.8% of the total shares outstanding.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大權力。我們注意到,對於intellia therapeutics來說,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資。該公司最大的股東是ARk投資管理有限責任公司,持有11%的股份。BlackRock,Inc.和The Vanguard Group,Inc.分別持有9.4%和9.0%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,該公司的首席執行官John Leonard直接持有總流通股份的0.8%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查發現,該公司的股份超過一半由前十大股東持有,表明較大股東的利益在某種程度上被較小股東平衡。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Intellia Therapeutics
Intellia Therapeutics的內部股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
We can see that insiders own shares in Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$26m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以看到內部人士擁有intellia therapeutics股票。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是件好事。內部人士擁有價值2600萬美元的股票(以當前價格計算)。看到內部人士進行這種投資是件好事。您可以在這裏查看內部人士最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司12%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略它們。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但是肯定會對公司的運營產生影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Intellia Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Intellia Therapeutics has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但是要更好地了解Intellia Therapeutics,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例 - Intellia Therapeutics有2個警示標誌,我們認爲您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。