With 74% Institutional Ownership, Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 74% Institutional Ownership, Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Lockheed Martin's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 考慮到機構在股票中持有的大量股份,洛克希德馬丁的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
- 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 74% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一下洛克希德馬丁公司(紐交所:LMT)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。 機構擁有公司的最大股份,佔比74%。 也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現下行,可能損失最大)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lockheed Martin, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究洛克希德馬丁的每種股東類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lockheed Martin?
機構持股給我們關於洛克希德馬丁的哪些提示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Lockheed Martin does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lockheed Martin's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到洛克希德馬丁確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票並且喜歡它。但和其他所有人一樣,他們也可能錯。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們在進行'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險會更高。你可以在下面看到洛克希德馬丁的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總會更加複雜。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lockheed Martin. State Street Global Advisors, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.0% by the third-largest shareholder.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半已發行股票,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。對洛克希德馬丁而言,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。目前,道富銀行全球貨幣投資公司是最大股東,持有已發行股份的15%。第二大股東持有約11%的已發行股份,緊隨其後的是第三大股東持有9.0%的已發行股份。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
內部人員擁有佛山藍火箭電子股份有限公司的重要比例。內部人員在這家69億元人民幣的企業中持有25億元人民幣的股份,看到內部人員如此投資是很好的。如果這些內部人員最近一直在購買,那就值得檢查。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Lockheed Martin
洛克希德馬丁的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Lockheed Martin Corporation in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$75m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的數據顯示,洛克希德馬丁公司的內部持有者以自己的名義擁有不到1%的股份。 這是一家非常大的公司,因此如果內部持有者擁有公司的大比例股份,這將是令人驚訝的。 儘管他們的持有量不到1%,我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值7500萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 可以說,最近的買賣情況同樣重要。 您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此他們不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種擁有量可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Lockheed Martin is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
雖然考慮公司的不同所有者群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,洛克希德馬丁在我們的投資分析中顯示了2個警示信號,您應該了解...
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。