share_log

After a Year of 7.6% Returns, Global Net Lease, Inc.'s (NYSE:GNL) Share Price Drop Last Week May Have Less of an Impact on Institutional Investors

After a Year of 7.6% Returns, Global Net Lease, Inc.'s (NYSE:GNL) Share Price Drop Last Week May Have Less of an Impact on Institutional Investors

經歷了7.6%的回報率一年之後,全球淨租賃公司(紐交所:GNL)的股價上週下跌可能對機構投資者的影響較小
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 22:02

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Global Net Lease's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 鑑於機構在股票中持有大量股份,Global Net Lease的股價可能會受到其交易決定的影響
  • 業務的51%由前7名股東持有。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

If you want to know who really controls Global Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE:GNL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着Global Net Lease, Inc. (紐交所:GNL),那麼您就需要看看其股權登記表的構成。 擁有最大股份的是擁有76%所有權的機構群體。 換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下行風險)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.8% in value last week. Still, the 7.6% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

沒有股東願意在投資中虧錢,尤其是機構投資者,他們上週看到自己的持股價值下降了3.8%。不過,7.6%的一年漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但他們很可能會對未來的損失感到警惕。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Global Net Lease.

在下面的圖表中,我們着眼於Global Net Lease的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:GNL Ownership Breakdown October 1st 2024
紐約交易所:GNL 所有權拆分 2024年10月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Global Net Lease?

機構持股告訴我們關於Global Net Lease的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Global Net Lease. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Global Net Lease's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Global Net Lease擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中擁有一定程度的信譽。然而,最好還是警惕依賴於所謂的機構投資者帶來的驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價急劇下跌。因此,看一下Global Net Lease下面的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:GNL Earnings and Revenue Growth October 1st 2024
紐交所:GNL營收與營業收入增長2024年10月1日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Global Net Lease. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 14% of common stock, and Bellevue Capital Partners, LLC holds about 12% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的該公司股份,因此它們可以共同行使重要權力。對於Global Net Lease,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有該公司14%的股份。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股東,持有14%的普通股,而Bellevue Capital Partners, LLC持有該公司約12%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現該公司超過一半的股權由前7大股東持有,這意味着較小股東的利益在一定程度上可以平衡較大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Global Net Lease

Global Net Lease內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Global Net Lease, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$11m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部持有Global Net Lease, Inc.不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部持有價值1100萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一些內部持有總是好的,但值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Global Net Lease. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有24%股權的普通公衆,主要包括個人投資者,在Global Net Lease上具有一定的影響力。儘管擁有這樣的股權相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能沒有足夠的力量來改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Global Net Lease (including 1 which is a bit concerning) .

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們在Global Net Lease發現的2個警示信號(其中1個有點令人關注)。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論