Leidos Holdings (NYSE:LDOS) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Leidos Holdings (NYSE:LDOS) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Leidos Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:LDOS) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
由伯克希爾哈撒韋的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李錄在談到投資風險時毫不掩飾地表示:「最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是是否會遭受永久性的資本損失。」 當我們考慮公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡看其債務使用情況,因爲債務過多可能會導致破產。 我們注意到紐交所上市公司Leidos Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:LDOS) 的資產負債表上確實有債務。 但這筆債務會讓股東擔憂嗎?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業無法償還債務,那麼它存在於債權人的支配之下。 在最壞的情況下,公司如果無法償還債權人的款項,可能會破產。 然而,更普遍(但成本仍然高昂)的情況是企業必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東權益,只爲了控制債務。 當然,債務可以是企業中的重要工具,特別是對資本密集型企業而言。 在考慮一個公司的債務水平時的第一步是綜合考慮其現金和債務。
What Is Leidos Holdings's Net Debt?
Leidos Holdings的淨債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Leidos Holdings had US$4.59b of debt in June 2024, down from US$4.89b, one year before. However, it also had US$823.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$3.77b.
您可以點擊下面的圖形查看歷史數據,但該圖顯示,Leidos Holdings在2024年6月有45.9億美元的債務,低於一年前的48.9億美元。 但同時它也有82300萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲37.7億美元。
How Strong Is Leidos Holdings' Balance Sheet?
Leidos控股的資產負債表有多牢靠?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Leidos Holdings had liabilities of US$3.51b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$4.89b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$823.0m as well as receivables valued at US$2.62b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$4.96b.
根據最近披露的資產負債表,Leidos控股在12個月內到期的負債爲35.1億美元,超過12個月到期的負債爲48.9億美元。 抵消這些義務,它手頭有82300萬美元的現金以及12個月內到期的應收賬款價值26.2億美元。 因此,其負債超過現金和(近期)應收賬款的總和爲49.6億美元。
Leidos Holdings has a very large market capitalization of US$21.5b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.
Leidos控股擁有高達215億美元的市值,因此如果有需要,很可能會籌集現金來改善其資產負債表。 但是,仔細研究其償債能力仍然是值得的。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。
Leidos Holdings's net debt of 2.0 times EBITDA suggests graceful use of debt. And the fact that its trailing twelve months of EBIT was 7.9 times its interest expenses harmonizes with that theme. Importantly, Leidos Holdings grew its EBIT by 36% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Leidos Holdings's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Leidos控股的淨負債爲EBITDA的2.0倍,表明其合理運用債務。 其最近12個月的EBIT是其利息支出的7.9倍,與這一主題相契合。值得一提的是,Leidos控股在過去12個月內將其EBIT增長了36%,這種增長將使其更容易償還債務。 在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要專注的領域。 但更重要的是,未來的盈利將決定Leidos控股未來能否保持健康的資產負債表。 因此,如果您想知道專業人士的看法,您可能會發現對分析師盈利預測的這份免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Leidos Holdings recorded free cash flow worth 75% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
最後,一家公司只能用真金白銀償還債務,而不能用會計利潤。 因此,我們明顯需要看一下這個EBIt是否帶來相應的自由現金流。 在最近三年中,Leidos控股錄得的自由現金流價值爲其EBIT的75%,這在正常範圍內,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅收。 這筆真金白銀意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Leidos Holdings's EBIT growth rate suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think Leidos Holdings's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Leidos Holdings .
Leidos Holdings的EBIt增長率表明它可以像Cristiano Ronaldo在14歲以下守門員面前進球一樣輕鬆地處理其債務。好消息不僅如此,其將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的能力也支持這一印象!從更大的角度來看,我們認爲Leidos Holdings對債務的利用似乎相當合理,我們對此並不擔心。畢竟,明智的槓桿可以提高資產回報率。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是一個明顯的起點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍之外的風險。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的Leidos Holdings的3個警示信號。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。