share_log

Institutional Investors Control 83% of Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 4.7%

Institutional Investors Control 83% of Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 4.7%

機構投資者控制Salesforce, Inc.(紐交所:CRM)83%,股價上漲4.7%後,上週受到獎勵。
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 00:10

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Salesforce's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 23 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 考慮到機構在股票中擁有大量股權,賽富時的股票價格可能受到它們交易決策的影響
  • 前23個股東擁有公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM),重要的是了解企業的所有權結構。 我們可以看到機構擁有公司83%的所有權。 換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$12b in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 36% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週該公司市值增加了120億美元,這對機構投資者來說是個好兆頭。目前投資回報率爲36%,上週的增長讓人感到歡迎。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Salesforce.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注賽富時不同的所有權群體。

big
NYSE:CRM Ownership Breakdown September 30th 2024
紐交所:CRm 2024年9月30日的所有權分析

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Salesforce?

機構所有權對賽富時有何影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Salesforce does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Salesforce's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到賽富時確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中擁有一定的信譽度。 但是,最好對依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。 他們有時也會犯錯。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。 因此,值得查看下面的賽富時收益歷史記錄。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:CRM Earnings and Revenue Growth September 30th 2024
紐交所:CRm 收益和營業收入增長2024年9月30日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Salesforce is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.0%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.8% of common stock, and Capital Research and Management Company holds about 5.7% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Marc Benioff directly holds 2.3% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有超過公司50%的股份,因此他們共同可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。賽富時不是對沖基金持有。公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有9.0%的股份。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股東,持有7.8%的普通股,Capital Research and Management Company持有約5.7%的公司股份。此外,公司CEO Marc Benioff直接持有總流通股份的2.3%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 23 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

更詳細的所有權數據顯示,前23大股東共擁有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東佔多數。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Salesforce

賽富時內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Salesforce, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$7.1b. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東可能會對於了解到賽富時有內部人持有股份感興趣。內部人擁有價值71億美元的大量股份。大多數人會認爲這顯示了股東和董事會間良好的利益一致性。但仍值得查看這些內部人是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

我認爲查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但是爲了獲得真正的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險 - Cadence銀行有3個需要引起我們關注的警告信號。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論