We Think KB Home (NYSE:KBH) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt
We Think KB Home (NYSE:KBH) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt
The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that KB Home (NYSE:KBH) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
由伯克希爾哈撒韋的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李錄在談到'最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是是否會面臨資本的永久損失'時毫不猶豫。在評估一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過載可能導致災難。我們注意到Kb Home(紐約交易所:KBH)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但股東們是否應該擔心公司的債務使用呢?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什麼時候負債才是一個問題?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
債務在業務遇到困難無法償還時會提供幫助,無論是通過新資本還是通過自由現金流。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能什麼也得不到。然而,一種更常見(但仍昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以較低的股價稀釋股東,以便簡單地控制債務。然而,通過取代稀釋,債務對於那些需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業來說是一種極好的工具。考慮公司的債務水平時的第一步是將其現金和債務合併考慮。
How Much Debt Does KB Home Carry?
Kb Home承擔了多少債務?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that KB Home had US$1.69b in debt in August 2024; about the same as the year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$374.9m, its net debt is less, at about US$1.32b.
下面的圖表顯示,Kb Home在2024年8月有16.9億美元的債務;與前一年幾乎相同。然而,由於其擁有3749萬美元的現金儲備,淨債務更少,大約13.2億美元。
A Look At KB Home's Liabilities
審視kb home的負債情況
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that KB Home had liabilities of US$1.16b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.69b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$374.9m as well as receivables valued at US$373.5m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$2.10b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,kb home有116億美元的短期到期負債,169億美元的長期到期負債。抵消這些義務的是,它持有3749萬美元現金以及價值3735萬美元的應收款項,其中有12個月到期。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收款項的組合多21億美元。
KB Home has a market capitalization of US$6.30b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.
kb home的市值爲63億美元,因此如果需要,它很有可能籌集資金以改善其資產負債表。但很明顯,我們一定要仔細研究它是否能夠在不稀釋的情況下管理債務。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
爲了衡量公司相對於其收益的債務情況,我們計算其淨負債除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)和其利息支出除以利息前收益(EBIT)的比例(其利息覆蓋率)。這種方法的優點是,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨負債與 EBITDA),又考慮到了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)。
KB Home's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 1.6 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its strong interest cover of 1k times, makes us even more comfortable. On the other hand, KB Home's EBIT dived 14%, over the last year. We think hat kind of performance, if repeated frequently, could well lead to difficulties for the stock. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine KB Home's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
kb home的淨債務與EBITDA比率約爲1.6,表明債務使用只是適度的。其強大的利息保障倍數達到0.1倍,使我們更加放心。另一方面,kb home的EBIT在過去一年下降了14%。我們認爲這種表現如果經常重複,可能會給股票帶來困難。資產負債表顯然是在分析債務時需要重點關注的領域。但最終決定kb home能否維持健康資產負債表的將是未來收益,超過其他任何因素。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師盈利預測的免費報告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, KB Home produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 58% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.
最後,業務需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不能解決問題。因此,我們始終會查看EBIT中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,kb home創造了堅實的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的58%,與我們的預期大致相同。這筆自由現金流使公司有能力在適當時期償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
When it comes to the balance sheet, the standout positive for KB Home was the fact that it seems able to cover its interest expense with its EBIT confidently. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. In particular, EBIT growth rate gives us cold feet. When we consider all the factors mentioned above, we do feel a bit cautious about KB Home's use of debt. While we appreciate debt can enhance returns on equity, we'd suggest that shareholders keep close watch on its debt levels, lest they increase. We'd be motivated to research the stock further if we found out that KB Home insiders have bought shares recently. If you would too, then you're in luck, since today we're sharing our list of reported insider transactions for free.
當涉及資產負債表時,kb home的顯著優點在於,它似乎能夠自信地覆蓋利息支出。然而,我們對其他觀察並不那麼令人鼓舞。特別是,EBIt增長率讓我們有些擔憂。綜上所述,我們對kb home的債務使用有些謹慎。雖然我們欣賞債務可以增加股本回報率,但我們建議股東密切關注其債務水平,以免增加。如果我們發現kb home內部人士最近買入股票,我們就會有動力進一步研究該股票。如果您也有此需求,那麼您很幸運,因爲今天我們免費分享我們的內部交易報告名單。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。