share_log

With 64% Institutional Ownership, Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 64% Institutional Ownership, Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

擁有64%機構持股的Verizon通信公司(紐交所:VZ)是大玩家中的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  00:08

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Verizon Communications implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 25 shareholders own 39% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構在verizon通信中持有大量股份意味着他們對該公司的股價具有重大影響力
  • 前二十五大股東佔公司的39%。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 64% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看verizon通信股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有最大的股份,佔64%。換句話說,該群體最有可能從他們對該公司的投資中獲益(或損失最多)

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Verizon Communications, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解verizon通信的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:VZ Ownership Breakdown September 27th 2024
紐交所:VZ 2024年9月27日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Verizon Communications?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於Verizon通信-半導體?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Verizon Communications does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Verizon Communications' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,verizon通信確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。這可能表明公司在投資社區中享有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是謹慎依賴所謂的機構投資者帶來的驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的觀點,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看一下verizon通信下面的營收歷史數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:VZ Earnings and Revenue Growth September 27th 2024
紐交所:verizon 營收和收入增長2024年9月27日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Verizon Communications. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.4% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。我們注意到對Verizon Communications,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。目前,Vanguard Group, Inc. 是最大的股東,持有8.4%的股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.3%的股份,第三大股東持有4.4%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Verizon Communications

Verizon通信-半導體內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that Verizon Communications Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$53m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,verizon通信-半導體公司內部持有不到1%的股份。由於這是一家非常大的公司,所以看到內部持有大量公司股份將會令人驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共擁有價值5300萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出股份可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 36% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有該公司36%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。儘管持有的份額很大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同,它們可能無法改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Verizon Communications is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

儘管考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,verizon通信在我們的投資分析中顯示了4個警告信號,您應該了解...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論