share_log

Smurfit Westrock Plc (NYSE:SW) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 52%

Smurfit Westrock Plc (NYSE:SW) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 52%

Smurfit westrock有限公司 (紐交所:SW) 是機構投資者中最受青睞的股票之一,他們擁有52%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  09/27 18:16

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Smurfit Westrock implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構在 Smurfit Westrock 的大量持股意味着他們對該公司的股價有重大影響
  • 該公司共有25位投資者,持股比例爲45%。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

A look at the shareholders of Smurfit Westrock Plc (NYSE:SW) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下 Smurfit Westrock Plc(NYSE:SW)的股東,我們可以看出哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司 52% 的股權。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Smurfit Westrock.

在下面的圖表中,我們會放大觀察斯姆菲特威斯特羅克的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:SW Ownership Breakdown September 27th 2024
紐交所: SW所有權拆分 2024年9月27日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Smurfit Westrock?

機構持股在斯莫菲特威斯特羅克公司有什麼含義?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Smurfit Westrock already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Smurfit Westrock, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

斯姆菲特威斯特羅克已經有機構股東。實際上,他們在公司中擁有一定比例的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售股票,往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得查看斯姆菲特威斯特羅克的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:SW Earnings and Revenue Growth September 27th 2024
紐交所:SW 盈利和營業收入增長於2024年9月27日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Smurfit Westrock. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.0% and 5.0% of the stock.

投資者應當注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大權力。對斯莫菲特威斯特洛克,對沖基金並沒有持有太多股份。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有15%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約6.0% 和5.0%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Smurfit Westrock

Smurfit Westrock的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Smurfit Westrock Plc. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$74m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士擁有Smurfit Westrock Plc不到1%的股份。 由於規模如此之大,我們並不指望內部人士擁有大部分股票。他們共擁有價值7400萬美元的股票。可以說,最近的買賣與內幕交易同樣重要。您可以點擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 48% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Smurfit Westrock. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有48%股份的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Smurfit Westrock具有一定影響力。雖然這個群體不能確定公司的決策,但肯定對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Smurfit Westrock (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經確定了westrock有4個警示信號(其中1個有點令人關注),您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論