share_log

We Like These Underlying Return On Capital Trends At Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE:ADM)

We Like These Underlying Return On Capital Trends At Archer-Daniels-Midland (NYSE:ADM)

我們喜歡阿徹丹尼爾斯中部基礎資本回報率的趨勢 (紐交所:ADM)
Simply Wall St ·  09/27 02:22

If you're looking for a multi-bagger, there's a few things to keep an eye out for. Typically, we'll want to notice a trend of growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and alongside that, an expanding base of capital employed. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. Speaking of which, we noticed some great changes in Archer-Daniels-Midland's (NYSE:ADM) returns on capital, so let's have a look.

如果您正在尋找一個多袋股票,有一些事情需要注意。 通常,我們會注意到資本運用率(ROCE)不斷增長的趨勢,同時也會看到資本運用的基礎不斷擴大。 最終,這表明這是一個以不斷增加的投資回報率重新投資利潤的業務。 說到這一點,我們注意到亞徹-丹尼爾斯-米德蘭(紐交所:ADM)的資本回報率有了一些很大的變化,讓我們來看一看。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

資本僱用回報率(ROCE)是什麼?

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Archer-Daniels-Midland:

如果您以前沒有使用過ROCE,它測量公司從其業務中使用的資本獲得的"回報"(稅前利潤)。 分析師使用這個公式爲亞徹-丹尼爾斯-米德蘭公司計算ROCE:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。

0.087 = US$3.0b ÷ (US$53b - US$19b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

0.087 = 30億美元 ÷(530億美元 - 190億美元)(基於2024年6月的過去十二個月)。

So, Archer-Daniels-Midland has an ROCE of 8.7%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Food industry average of 11%.

因此,亞徹-丹尼爾斯-米德蘭的ROCE爲8.7%。 從絕對角度來看,這是一個較低的回報率,並且也表現不佳,低於食品行業的平均水平爲11%。

big
NYSE:ADM Return on Capital Employed September 26th 2024
紐交所:ADM資本運用率2024年9月26日

In the above chart we have measured Archer-Daniels-Midland's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you're interested, you can view the analysts predictions in our free analyst report for Archer-Daniels-Midland .

在上面的圖表中,我們已經衡量了阿徹·丹尼爾斯·米德蘭公司先前的 ROCE 與其之前的表現,但未來可能更重要。 如果您感興趣,您可以查看我們爲阿徹·丹尼爾斯·米德蘭公司準備的免費分析師報告。

So How Is Archer-Daniels-Midland's ROCE Trending?

那麼,阿徹·丹尼爾斯·米德蘭公司的 ROCE 走勢如何?

Archer-Daniels-Midland's ROCE growth is quite impressive. The figures show that over the last five years, ROCE has grown 66% whilst employing roughly the same amount of capital. So our take on this is that the business has increased efficiencies to generate these higher returns, all the while not needing to make any additional investments. The company is doing well in that sense, and it's worth investigating what the management team has planned for long term growth prospects.

阿徹·丹尼爾斯·米德蘭公司的 ROCE 增長相當令人印象深刻。數據顯示,在過去的五年裏,ROCE 增長了 66%,同時幾乎使用了相同數量的資本。因此,我們認爲業務增加了效率,以生成更高的回報,同時無需進行任何額外的投資。從這個意義上講,該公司做得不錯,值得探究管理團隊對長期增長前景計劃了什麼。

The Bottom Line

還有一件事需要注意的是,我們已經確定了上海醫藥的2個警告信號,了解這些信號應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。

To bring it all together, Archer-Daniels-Midland has done well to increase the returns it's generating from its capital employed. And with a respectable 67% awarded to those who held the stock over the last five years, you could argue that these developments are starting to get the attention they deserve. With that being said, we still think the promising fundamentals mean the company deserves some further due diligence.

總的來說,阿徹·丹尼爾斯·米德蘭公司已經成功地提高了從投入資本中獲得的回報。而且,在過去的五年裏,股票持有人獲得了 67% 的回報,可以說值得關注這些發展。話雖如此,我們仍然認爲有希望的基本面意味着公司值得進一步的盡職調查。

Archer-Daniels-Midland does have some risks, we noticed 2 warning signs (and 1 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

阿徹·丹尼爾斯·米德蘭公司確實存在一些風險,我們注意到了 2 個警示標誌(以及 1 個不能被忽視的),我們認爲您應該了解。

For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.

Hao Tian International Construction Investment Group確實存在一些風險,我們已經發現了一條警示標誌,你可能會感興趣。對於那些喜歡投資於實力雄厚的公司的人,可以查看這個由財務狀況強大、股本回報率高的公司組成的免費列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論