With 67% Institutional Ownership, MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 67% Institutional Ownership, MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in MGM Resorts International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 機構對美高梅的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
- 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
- 最近有內部人員購買。
If you want to know who really controls MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 67% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着美高梅國際(紐約證券交易所:MGM),那麼您需要查看其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到機構擁有該公司最大的股份,佔有67%。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of MGM Resorts International, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解美高梅的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MGM Resorts International?
機構所有權告訴我們關於美高梅的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that MGM Resorts International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see MGM Resorts International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到美高梅確實有機構投資者;而且他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這暗示專業投資者中有些可信度。但我們不能僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤投資,就像每個人一樣。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在一種風險,即它們可能處於一種 '擁擠交易' 中。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司裏,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到美高梅的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加複雜。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in MGM Resorts International. The company's largest shareholder is IAC Inc., with ownership of 21%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.2% and 7.1% of the stock.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們共同擁有重要的話語權。對於美高梅國際來說,對沖基金沒有太多的股票。該公司最大的股東是iac inc,持有21%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.2%和7.1%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進一步了解,前8大股東持有該公司約51%的註冊股份,這意味着除了更大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。
Insider Ownership Of MGM Resorts International
美高梅內部人士的所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of MGM Resorts International. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$105m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,美高梅國際公司的內部持有人持有不到1%的股份。由於這是一家大公司,我們只希望內部持有人持有很小的比例。但 值得注意的是,他們擁有價值1.05億美元的股份。看到至少有一些內部持有是件好事,但可能值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in MGM Resorts International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,在美高梅國際公司持有11%的股份。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但肯定對公司的運行產生實質影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
We can see that public companies hold 21% of the MGM Resorts International shares on issue. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
我們可以看到,上市公司持有紐交所出售的美高梅21%的股份。我們不能確定,但很可能這是一個戰略性股份。這些企業可能是相似的,或者彼此合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand MGM Resorts International better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for MGM Resorts International that you should be aware of before investing here.
始終值得考慮不同的股東群體。但要更好地了解美高梅,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了2個警告信號,您在投資之前應該了解。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。