share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Abbott Laboratories' (NYSE:ABT) Recent US$8.3b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Abbott Laboratories' (NYSE:ABT) Recent US$8.3b Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構投資者可能會忽略雅培(紐交所:ABT)最近83億美元的市值下降,因爲長期利潤保持良好
Simply Wall St ·  09/25 20:05

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Abbott Laboratories' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 鑑於機構在股票中持有的大量股份,雅培的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 前25大股東擁有該公司47%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Abbott Laboratories (NYSE:ABT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 77% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制着雅培(紐交所: ABT),重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。 擁有最大股份的是持有77%股份的機構,換句話說,該團體將從對公司的投資中獲益最多(或者失去最多)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$200b last week. However, the 20% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週,該公司的市值跌至2000億美元后,受影響最大的是機構投資者。然而,股東們獲得的20%一年回報或許有所緩解。他們應當警惕未來可能出現的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Abbott Laboratories.

在下面的圖表中,我們着重研究了雅培的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:ABT Ownership Breakdown September 25th 2024
紐交所:ABt 2024年9月25日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Abbott Laboratories?

機構持股對雅培有什麼影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Abbott Laboratories does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Abbott Laboratories' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,雅培確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中享有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下以下雅培的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:ABT Earnings and Revenue Growth September 25th 2024
紐約證券交易所:雅培收益和營業收入增長2024年9月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Abbott Laboratories. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.6%. The second and third largest shareholders are Capital Research and Management Company and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.6%.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會決策。對於Abbott Laboratories,對沖基金持有的股份不多。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持股比例爲9.6%。第二和第三大股東分別是Capital Research and Management Company和BlackRock, Inc.,持股比例均爲7.6%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Abbott Laboratories

雅培的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Abbott Laboratories in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$1.1b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據顯示,內部人員以自己的名義持有雅培不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,所以看到內部人員持有公司的大部分股份會讓人感到驚訝。儘管他們的持股比例不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值11億美元的股份(按現價計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但也值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Abbott Laboratories. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

作爲22%的持股權,一般公衆,主要包括個體投資者,在雅培擁有一定的影響力。儘管這一持股比例相當可觀,但如果決定不與其他大股東保持一致,可能無法改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論